05/10/2006 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 4 Mr. Carlson stated there is an elevator located in the rear of the bldg, but it does not access the roof, therefore the overrun will be below the maximum height. He clarified that the parapet is proposed only on the front of the building. Mr. Rafferty asked why the parapet would not be included in the back of the building as well. Mr. Carlson replied that it would not be visible to anyone from the rear of the bldg. Mr. Bengtson clarified that the intent of the increased front building height is for visual appeal, and that it should be high enough to screen the mechanicals. Mr. Bengtson explained that the site plan has been revised to allow for additional parking spaces for future additions. He noted that the entire site will consist of shared parking. The applicant confirmed that each future phase will be brought back for site approval. He stated that they would have liked all of the buildings on the site to be built at the same time. He added that the hotel is now a Hampton Inn Suites, which is better than previously proposed. Brad Michel, 504 — 77th Street, expressed concern about the building height. He clarified that his property is located to the north of the hotel, and the hotel will directly affect the view from the back of his home. He explained that he was present at the meeting to get more information for himself and his neighbors. He continued that initially the developer stated that the hotel height would be within city ordinances, and now that has changed. He preferred that the hotel would remain three stories. Mr. Michel stated that the height is less of a concern now that he attended the meeting and received clarification on the project. Mr. Pogalz made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. and was supported Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Pogalz asked if the fire department was aware of the increased height request. Staff replied that they receive all applications, and that staff had not received any negative comments from them. Rafferty stated that he likes the idea of the mechanical systems being screened, and that he is not opposed to adding the decorative element across the entire length of the roof. Mr. Pogalz asked the developer if the building would now consist of a pre -cast system instead of wood. The developer replied yes. Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend approval of an Amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 - 0. D. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy Townhomes Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES