My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/14/2006 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
06/14/2006 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 11:46:35 AM
Creation date
6/23/2014 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/14/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Pheasant Stroll Estates <br />page 4 <br />percentages of materials. The details of the buildings were not pursued for this report <br />because larger site planning issues pose significant questions that have not been resolved. <br />Streets, Access: A local circulation system of roads and access points is one of the <br />major elements of the 49/J planning study. Though the study is unfinished, all <br />preliminary concept plans show conceptual options for providing circulation and access <br />for land within the study area. The City is avoiding the creation of individual accesses <br />onto the arterial roads. (Hodgson and CR J are arterials.) The City has recognized access <br />management as an important planning consideration. Creating new access points creates <br />new conflict points, decreasing safety and impeding traffic flow on the arterial road. A <br />new local street located along the west border of this site would provide a single access <br />for all properties between Ware and Hodgson Roads. Optimally, it could align with <br />Shoreview's Kent St. on the south. Alternatively, the new street could be centered on the <br />existing western property line of the Pheasant Stroll site. The point is to create one <br />planned access points and eliminate all other driveways onto CR J. <br />The submitted plan includes a private drive access onto CR J. The applicants propose a <br />temporary private access to CR J which then would be removed in the future when the <br />new public street is built. The private drive would connect to the new public street near <br />the northwest corner of the site. <br />Two problems arise with the proposal. First, it would be difficult to get the "temporary" <br />access removed and connect with the new public street. Residents of the townhome <br />neighborhood likely would oppose removing an existing driveway access and substituting <br />a connection to a public street. Once an access exists, and the entire neighborhood is <br />built and populated while that access exists, it is very difficult to remove it. In addition, <br />we have experienced many occasions where residents oppose a new connection to an <br />abutting development after they are accustomed to isolation. <br />The second problem is that the proposed design puts all of a new street entirely on <br />another property. This would mean that the property owner to the west would bear the <br />entire loss of land to the road. It is typical to align roads on property lines, with half the <br />right of way dedicated from development on each side. <br />It is possible that the site could access directly onto Ware Road. However, this does not <br />resolve the need for a future public road on the west side and right of way for that road. <br />In short, the proposed design does not take into account the larger public interests in <br />access management. Staff does not support the proposed design. <br />The proposal does include additional 50 feet of right of way dedication for CR J. <br />However, more right of way is needed: 60 feet from centerline, which is what the Anoka <br />County Highway Dept. would plan for. This would push all the units north ten feet. In <br />addition, the setback from an arterial road is 40 feet, not the proposed 30 feet. Therefore, <br />with the right of way and complete setback, the units would need to move north 20 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.