My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/11/2011 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2011
>
05/11/2011 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2014 10:13:00 AM
Creation date
6/24/2014 11:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
05/11/2011
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2 Subds. 1. — 9. DRAFT AMENDMENTS May 2011 <br />will not provide information relevant to the variance necessary to <br />review the application. <br />1) Scale (engineering only) at not less than one (1) inch equals <br />one hundred (100) feet. <br />2) North point indication. <br />3) Existing boundaries with lot dimension and lot area. <br />4) Existing buildings, structures and improvements. <br />5) Easements of record. <br />6) Delineated wetland boundary, to include the OHWL of any <br />lakes or DNR waters. <br />7) All encroachments. <br />8) Legal description. <br />d. Graphic information, plans, specifications, or other materials that <br />illustrate the requested variance. <br />e. Narrative description of the unique hardship associated with the <br />property that warrants the consideration of the variance, to include: <br />1) That the property in question cannot be put to reasonable <br />use if used under the conditions allowed by the official <br />controls. <br />2) That the plight of the landowner is due to physical <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner. <br />3) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations <br />alone if a reasonable use for the property exists under the <br />terms of the ordinance. <br />4) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the <br />applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this <br />ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />5) That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit <br />and intent of the ordinance. <br />Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Administration <br />Amended per Ord. No. 05 -09 2 -16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.