My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/12/2011 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2011
>
10/12/2011 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2014 11:44:01 AM
Creation date
6/25/2014 9:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/12/2011
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 14, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />have stated that they consider the city's signage requirements too restrictive to make their <br />business successful. Council has discussed the issue and requested that the planning and <br />zoning board provide comment. <br />The board was asked whether they considered the city's existing signage requirements to <br />be too restrictive. <br />Chair Tralle pointed out that when the city revised its requirements not that long ago, <br />very few business owners in the city showed up to make comments. He added that a lot <br />of effort went into revising the ordinance several years ago with little feedback from the <br />public. Therefore he considered that if someone was requesting a change, they should <br />bring their request to a planning and zoning board meeting to state their concerns. Staff <br />explained that the City sent out letters to all businesses in the city at the time inviting <br />them to participate in that ordinance revision process. <br />Staff stated that letters recently were mailed /business4wners in the city explaining <br />temporary signage requirements. Currently, some businesses are in compliance while <br />others are not Business owners consider signage be important for competetion with <br />other businesses and the success of their sales. Some business owners are wondering <br />why the city is preventing them from advertising their business with signage. <br />The board was asked to address how <br />allowed for a business <br />ow often t orary signs should be <br />Board member comments included the Bowing: <br />• Window�signage shoul e enough for lira <br />permitted temporary signage allowed. <br />i <br />• The city should be enfo ing those businesses that are not in compliance with the <br />rules. <br />ess owners to advertise, in addition to the <br />• The number of allowable days for a temporary sign could seem restrictive and <br />arbitrary. Certain businesses do need signage to be successful and the ordinance <br />could be less restrictive. The city should revisit the length of time allowed for <br />temporary signs, <br />• The city has strict requirements to keep architectural standards in the city of high <br />quality, therefore businesses should not cover up high quality architcture with <br />increased signage. <br />• The city should consider allowing temporary signs for a longer period, but should not <br />consider allowing more signage. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.