My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/13/2012 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2012
>
06/13/2012 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2014 11:38:29 AM
Creation date
6/25/2014 9:40:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/13/2012
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 Cities need to be able to step up and be prepared to help the developers <br />with sources of financial aid. <br />4 The new normal is doom and gloom. The new normal does not fit into the <br />context of Lino Lakes due to the political environment. <br />5 Both enlightening to our current situation and a confirmation of what 1 <br />already thought about the current situation of Lino Lakes future. <br />6 1 thought the night was extremely well spent. I typed a page of notes the <br />next morning. <br />7 A push to build rental apartments on the Legacy site <br />8 Understanding the needs from developers. <br />9 Always good to hear from the developers point of view. however their <br />needs are not always in the best interest of the city. <br />10 Very little. Not sure what the purpose of the workshop was? Felt i could <br />have read the content on my own. <br />11 The panel has a good understanding of the economy and planning trends <br />at a 30,000 foot level- not city or local level. <br />12 The demographics of Gen Y was interesting. <br />13 The demographics of Gen Y was interesting. <br />12. What changes would you suggest to the work session format? <br />9 Responses <br />1 More upfront input from participants on where they see the city at and <br />vision for the future <br />2 More time for participants to ask questions. 1 think some felt that they <br />didn't get enough time for discussion. <br />3 None. 1 liked it. <br />4 Format was great. The panel did a great job of holding questions until the <br />end. Given the amount of information to present, control the timing of <br />questions was extremely important. I thought it would have made sense to <br />have someone from the city introduce the panel moderator and explain to <br />the group why they were retained and goals for the evening. <br />5 More feedback (and listening) from the attendees. In a 2hr workshop panel <br />talked for 1hr 40 minutes, attendees didn't have much voice and staff <br />didn't have any voice. <br />6 More formal invite to the general public to attend. <br />7 Allow more time for Q and A and feedback from the attendees. <br />8 Research the community's closer and utilize findings in the discussion more <br />then utilizing the research that fits at a 30,000 foot level. <br />9 Nothing specific to change from my perspective. <br />to <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.