My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/2013 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2013
>
12/11/2013 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 10:03:59 AM
Creation date
6/26/2014 11:42:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
12/11/2013
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria and Findings of Fact. No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria <br />of Section 2, Subd. 4.A.1.(a -g). The City shall make findings regarding compliance with <br />these criteria. <br />a. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />The intent of the Shoreland Overlay District in regards to structural setbacks from public <br />street right of way is to be consistent with the underlying zoning ordinance. The variance <br />would allow a 25 foot setbackfrom the public street right of way which is consistent with <br />the R -2, Two Family zoning district. <br />b. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The land is guided for Low <br />Density Sewered Residential development and single family homes are allowed. <br />c. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. "Practical <br />difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the <br />property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br />ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the ordinance. The construction of a single family home in a residential neighborhood <br />is using the property in a reasonable manner. The practical difficulty of the 30 foot <br />Shoreland Overlay district front setback is not consistent with the underlying zoning front <br />setback requirement of 25 feet. The practical difficulty is also compounded by the <br />required Shoreland Overlay District 150 foot setbackfrom the OHWL which limits the <br />buildable area of the lot. <br />d. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by <br />the landowner. The Shoreland Overlay District ordinance should have been amended <br />when the Zoning Ordinance was amended in 2012 to reflect setback consistency with the <br />underlying zoning district. <br />e. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The construction of a <br />single family home in a residential neighborhood is consistent with the essential <br />character of the locality. The R -2 Two Family District allows for a 25 foot front setback. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.