Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Public, Educational, Religious in GB and LB <br />page 3 <br />b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land <br />uses of the area. <br />c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and <br />other applicable City Codes. <br />d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of <br />the City when: <br />1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or <br />B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of <br />service more than one grade. <br />2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by <br />a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. <br />3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by <br />a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. <br />4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing <br />access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision <br />developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to <br />ensure a level of service D or better. <br />5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the <br />structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed <br />subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. <br />6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement <br />Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer - financed <br />improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br />7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I- 35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange <br />impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota <br />Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements <br />needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the <br />subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time <br />frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, <br />including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and <br />other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br />8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br />