Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />North Springs Church CUP <br />page 3 <br />The extra right of way squeezed the site a little. In order to fit the proposed building and <br />parking drive, the VFW requested a setback variance. The required setback from an <br />arterial roadway (Lake Drive, CSAH 23) is 40'. The building would be approximately <br />34' from the new property line. The parking drive would be about 5' from the line <br />instead of the required 15'. <br />Since the full right of way would be in place, it eliminated concern about additional <br />roadway needs, the public costs of condemning land, and possibly demolishing buildings <br />or other facilities. The building is six feet closer than normally required and the parking <br />drive is 9.5' closer than normally required. Another issue here was the 5'+ of land for <br />landscaping between the parking curb and the right of way. It is difficult to provide <br />extensive landscaping and screening in this strip. However, there is little screening along <br />Lake Drive in this commercial area and the project significantly improved the appearance <br />of the site, including landscaping. <br />The setback variances were granted along with the VFW project approval (Resol. 04 -18). <br />These variances continue with the site and building. <br />Lighting: Plans show fixtures in the parking lot on six poles. Three, in the northern <br />parking area, have two fixtures each and have been installed. One single fixture is to be <br />near the Lois Lane driveway, and two others in the southern parking area. The one near <br />the Lois Lane driveway location has been installed, even though the driveway and <br />parking have not. In addition, it is crooked and must be repaired. <br />The submitted photometric plan indicates that lighting meets city standards: no more <br />than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line to the east, and no more than 1 0 at <br />street right of way lines. The exterior building lighting is included. The submitted fixture <br />cut sheets show 90 degree cut off fixtures in compliance with city requirements. The <br />lighting under the north and south entry canopies is completely recessed. Oddly, the <br />fixtures shown on building elevations and installed on the exterior walls do not match <br />those on the lighting plan in type or number. This did not result in a significant <br />discrepancy, and the existing lights are acceptable. <br />There seems to be another pedestal for a light near the Lake Drive driveway. This is not <br />included on the lighting plan. If a light is to be installed here, it must be determined what <br />type of fixture and a photometric analysis done to ensure it meets city standards. <br />Three flagpoles were installed, and were shown on plans. However, no lighting for the <br />flags was included on the lighting or any other plan. One large lamp was installed to <br />shine up on the flag, and poles for two more are present. Since these lamps were not <br />included in the original approved plans, they should not be there. The additional lights <br />raise questions about glare for motorists and effects of skyward lighting on nearby <br />residents. If the church wants these lamps, it must submit a photometric analysis to <br />ensure city standards are met. Even if the standards are met, landscaping around the <br />lights must be installed. If the lamps don't meet city requirements, the existing one must <br />be removed and the wiring for all safely addressed. <br />