My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/12/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
01/12/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:40:24 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 1:02:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/12/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Granting approval to the minor subdivision will require approval of a variance for lot <br />size. We believe this is a unique situation not created by the property owner that would <br />fit the variance criteria listed below. <br />Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking <br />subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his <br />property not created by the land owner. That the hardship is not due to economic <br />considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the <br />terms of the ordinance. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic consideration alone and when a reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special <br />privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br />buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance <br />In response to the criteria above we would comment that the property can be but to a <br />reasonable use as it currently exists, however, this minor subdivision would create a lot <br />for the existing home that is the same as the adjoining properties and bring the vacant <br />parcel in closer compliance to the existing provisions of the ordinance. The current lot <br />configuration was created at a time when the minimum lot size was something less than <br />10 acres. That situation is unique in relation to today's requirements. The hardship arises <br />from the lot configuration and unavailability of utilities. No special privilege is being <br />extended, this item was reviewed on a stand alone basis and determined unique to the <br />property in question. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow existing homes, <br />construction prior to 1994, to subdivide down to 1 acre and allow for future <br />redevelopment in an appropriate manner. <br />Staff would, therefore, recommend approval of this minor subdivision and variance with <br />the following conditions: <br />1. The applicant provide a current survey of the two new parcels. The lot <br />containing the dwelling shall be one acre in size with 227' of lot frontage and <br />configured as indicated on sketch B which is attached. The vacant parcel shall <br />be combined into one 4+ acre parcel. <br />2. The applicant shall provide documentation that there is an alternate site for a <br />septic system on the existing homesite should the existing system fail. <br />3. Park Dedication shall be required for any new construction on the larger <br />parcel per the Subdivision Ordinance. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.