My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/14/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
06/14/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 11:04:27 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 2:06:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/14/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Bluebill Ponds <br />June 14, 2000 <br />page 5 <br />the way to 4th Ave. The residential streets provide bicycle and pedestrian access across <br />this plat and to the Highland Meadows park. <br />The additional right of way being dedicated for Main St. provides enough width for a <br />future trail to be constructed there. <br />The park dedication requirement is about 3.3 acres, or the equivalent in cash. We <br />estimate that the cash dedication would be approximately $89,000, depending on the land <br />value. The Park Board reviewed the latest plan revision on June 5. The Park Board's <br />recommendations are attached. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The Environmental Board considered the original application on September 29, 1999. <br />Though the plan layout has changed since then, the environmental conditions on the site <br />have not. The Environmental Board's recommendations are attached. That Board <br />recommends a 50 ft. buffer around the forest on the east edge of the site, infiltration and <br />overland runoff design where possible, open spaces to be incorporated into the design, <br />use of native vegetation, a buffer around wetlands, and deep tilling of topsoil. <br />This site is in the existing MUSA and zoned for residential development. No planned <br />development is involved. Therefore, the zoning requirements apply and there is little <br />room for flexibility or negotiation. Wetlands will be covered with an easement, though <br />the wetlands are not exceptional and there is little justification for exceptional measures. <br />The site is essentially an open field with little in the way of natural features or potential <br />for interesting open space. Infiltration is required by the Watershed District and the City <br />when possible. Native vegetation can be required around ponds and wetlands. <br />While no buffer is provided, the submitted tree plan should be revised to accommodate <br />the City Environmental Specialist's comments in his memo �f June 1. These include <br />extension of the tree fence and oak wilt protection measures. <br />CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL <br />1. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to <br />any site grading. <br />2. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and <br />Rice Creek Watershed District prior to site grading. <br />3. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of June 1, 2000 must be addressed to his <br />• satisfaction prior to site grading. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.