My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/14/2007 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
02/14/2007 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 11:06:10 AM
Creation date
7/1/2014 1:03:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/14/2007
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comforts of Home Development Page 2 January 8, 2007 <br />Drainage Review <br />• City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />• <br />7. The proposed trail must be located beyond the 100 -year flood elevation of the proposed ponds <br />and existing wetland. <br />8. The rain garden and lift station should not be in the same location, as currently shown on the <br />Utility Plan. <br />9. Include depression storage located in EX -C in the existing conditions model and route EX -C and <br />EX -E through the existing 24" culvert located west of the site. The proposed discharge rates for <br />the 2 -, 10 -, and 100- year rates shall not exceed the existing 2 -, 10 -, and 100- year rates for the <br />site. <br />10. The soil boring information on the SWPPP Plan indicates that the predominant soils on the site <br />are Type A soils. Please clarify the curve numbers based on Type B soils used in the existing <br />conditions model. Disturbed areas under proposed conditions are required to be Type B soils. <br />11. The lag/CN method is used to determine the time of concentration based on the hydraulic length <br />and average land slope over the entire watershed. Therefore, the lag/CN method should not be <br />used in combination with the TR -55 method for the determination of subcatchment curve <br />numbers. <br />12. The emergency overflow for Pond 1 discharges to the CSAH 49 ditch; therefore, permit approval <br />from the County may be required. <br />13. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is required. <br />Minor Plan and Drainage Calculation Issues: <br />1. Show and label contours for all rain gardens and ponds on the Grading Plan and ensure that the <br />contours on the Grading Plan are consistent with stage- storage values in the model. <br />2. Indicate the overflow elevation and location of the existing wetland, stormwater ponds, rain <br />gardens, and road /parking lot low points on the Grading Plan. <br />3. Update the elevation of the 10:1 bench on the Grading Plan to correspond to the revised normal <br />water level. <br />4. A pre - treatment device, such as a sedimentation forebay or vegetated filter strip, is required <br />upstream of the infiltration areas to prevent accelerated decay of the infiltration capacity due to <br />clogging. <br />5. The typical pond skimmer detail located on Sheet G1 does not illustrate the pond outlet devices as <br />modeled. Update the pond skimmer detail to include details, such as orifice and pipe <br />configurations, consistent with the outlet devices defined in the model. <br />6. Include catchbasin and culvert inlet protection details on the plan. <br />7. Include notes on the Grading Plan incorporating the following: 1) the infiltration areas are not to <br />be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage areas have been constructed and fully <br />stabilized, and 2) final excavation of the infiltration areas should be completed using light tracked <br />equipment to avoid compacting the basin floor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.