My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/12/2007 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
12/12/2007 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2014 3:43:22 PM
Creation date
7/2/2014 12:21:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2007
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of <br />the staging plans for final platting of new residential units. The new unit of Vaughn's 1st <br />Addition will not be platted until 2008 and will fit within that year's allotment. <br />Preliminary Plat <br />Shoreland Ordinance: The subject site is adjacent to Wards Lake, which is considered a <br />Natural Environment Lake and therefore is subject to the more restrictive Shoreland Ordinance <br />Requirements for Lot Dimensions, Impervious Surface Coverage, and Setbacks. The lot <br />depicted on the submitted plats meets the minimum upland lot size of 20,000 square feet, but the <br />required setback from the Ordinary High Water Level of Wards Lake is not being met. In fact <br />the Shore Impact Zone, which is set at 75 feet for Wards Lake is being encroached upon as well. <br />The Shoreland Ordinance does not allow for an encroachment into the Shore Impact Zone, and <br />therefore a Variance is required to allow the proposal to continue. However, the plans do not <br />seem to be depicting the correct information. Staff is again asking the engineer to revise the <br />plans to clearly identify the correct Ordinary High Water Level, Wetland Delineation, Flood <br />Plain, and the Shore Impact Zone. <br />Staff is conceding that a residential use of the site should and will be allowed, however the <br />configuration proposed by the developer does not minimize the impact on the Shore Impact <br />Zone, and potentially creates the need for another variance to allow any future development of <br />Outlot A. Staff is requiring that a plan be submitted to prove that Outlot A can be developed in <br />the future without the need of a major variance and minimizing the impact on the Shore Impact <br />Zone. This would most likely need to be on the property adjacent to Birch Street, since the plans <br />submitted clearly show that a major variance to the OHWL setback would be needed for <br />placement of a 2nd structure at Ruffed Grouse. <br />Floodplain Ordinance: A portion of the subject site is located within the floodplain as defined <br />by the Rice Creek Watershed at an elevation of 887.6. The proposal for Lot 1 includes placing <br />the building pad within the flood plain, resulting in 200 cubic yards of fill over a 3,017 square <br />foot area of the flood plain. However, the Floodplain Ordinance also requires that any structure <br />placed in the floodplain maintain 15 feet surrounding the structure at a level no more than one <br />foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation for the area. This is not currently indicated <br />on the plan, and will result in an increase in the amount and area of floodplain fill required. <br />These plans will need to be revised to show compliance with this requirement. <br />Additionally, a Conditional Use Permit is required by the Floodplain Ordinance for placing a <br />principle structure within a floodplain. This will need to be properly noticed and a public <br />hearing will need to be held. <br />Setbacks: The submitted plans depict all required setbacks, except the 150 foot setback from the <br />Ordinary High Water Line as required by the Shoreland Ordinance. This setback is measured to <br />any improvement attached to the single family dwelling, including decks and /or patios. This <br />would mean that any and all improvements would be required to stay within the building pad <br />shown on the submitted plans. <br />Impervious Surface Coverage: The lot will be required to comply with the 30% <br />Impervious Surface Coverage requirement of the Shoreland Ordinance as they develop, the <br />• current building pad and drive would put the site at approximately 14.73 %. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.