My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/03/2004 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2004 Park Board Packets
>
05/03/2004 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 11:56:49 AM
Creation date
7/9/2014 8:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/03/2004
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Park Board Meeting - March 31, 2004 <br />Minutes <br />great opportunity to develop an interconnected latticework of <br />natural landscapes, greenways, and parks and trails. He noted <br />the City would in all probability not be able to accomplish all <br />its goals without working with developers. <br />Mr. Shoenbauer referred to a map pointing out the Natural <br />Resource Protected Areas and Natural Resource Conservation Areas. <br />He noted the Natural Resource Protected Areas generally have some <br />level of protection under current regulatory policies and <br />ordinances. However, the City should not automatically assume <br />those areas are protected. Work will have to be done by the City <br />to ensure those areas are protected. <br />Mr. Shoenbauer advised the Park System Plan is being updated, <br />with the City being reasonably situated for servicing future <br />needs. All exiting parks are also identified on the preliminary <br />Park System Plan. <br />Consideration of Initial Findings, Related to the Trail System <br />Plan - Mr. Shoenbauer advised the emphasis would be placed on the <br />recreational "value" and continuity in terms of the Trail System <br />Plan. Types of trails include high recreational value along with <br />destination type trails. <br />Consideration of Natural Resources Stewardship Planning Issues - <br />Mr. Shoenbauer advised stewardship refers to the thoughtful care <br />of the City's natural resources to preserve and protect their <br />intrinsic values. <br />Consideration of Implementation Challenges and Possible <br />Approaches - Mr. Shoenbauer public cost is a challenge in <br />regarding to implementing the City's vision. The City has <br />already been challenged in developing the park and trail system <br />to its optimum level. Leveraging to achieve its goals, such as <br />working with developers is one way to implement these goals as <br />well as managing development patterns. <br />Mr. Kukonen inquired about the best way to manage easements. Mr. <br />Shoenbauer advised in the City of Minnetonka, there has been a <br />legal agreement between the City and developer outlining the <br />Homeowners Association's responsibility for the easements. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated that if the City <br />has well defined goals, and could develop a partnership, <br />developers will be much more willing to work with the City to <br />achieve its vision within developments. <br />Pat Huelman, Park Board, stated he believes the City needs a very <br />defined process within the implementation plan for developers to <br />follow. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.