My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/03/2004 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2004 Park Board Packets
>
05/03/2004 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 11:56:49 AM
Creation date
7/9/2014 8:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/03/2004
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Park Board Meeting - March 31, 2004 <br />Minutes <br />Mr. Shoenbauer advised that if the City does not have the <br />commitment to implement the plan, there is no benefit to the <br />plan. <br />Ms. Barb Bauman, Environmental Board, asked if there is a ranking <br />system within the plan in regarding to valuable environmental <br />areas. Mr. Shoenbauer advised there is somewhat of a ranking <br />system. The plan looks at all areas and opportunities within the <br />City, not such the valuable environmental areas. He encouraged <br />the City to take that same approach. He also recommended the <br />City try to keep the athletic complex land for development of a <br />complex at some point in the future. <br />Mr. Shoenbauer advised the next step in the process is to get <br />some public participation. Participation by the public can <br />include open houses, individual meetings and surveys. He <br />indicated he would also talk to staff about strategies to develop <br />in terms of including other entities within the plan. <br />Mr. Huelman suggested the open houses include a focus on certain <br />areas of the City along with certain aspects of the plan, such as <br />park development or trail development. <br />Ms. Mary Jo O'Dean, Environmental Board, suggested the Homeowners <br />. Association's within the City also be involved in the public <br />input process. Mr. Shoenbauer indicated the Homeowners <br />Association's within the City could be contacted along with <br />landowner's that may be developing their land soon. <br />Community Development Director Grochala suggested developers <br />within the community as well as outside of the community also be <br />included in the public input process. <br />Mr. Shoenbauer advised he would develop a strategy plan from this <br />meeting and send e -mails to all Board Member's. He reviewed the <br />schedule for the plan noting it is anticipated that the City <br />Council will adopt the plan in mid July. <br />A brief recess was called at 7:57 for each Board to disperse and <br />reconvene their meetings individually. <br />Acting Chair Huelman reconvened the Park Board meeting at 8:03 <br />p.m. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MARCH 1, 2004: <br />Bill Kusterman made a motion, seconded by Katie Boyle, to approve <br />the March 1, 2004 minutes. The minutes were approved. <br />• SETTING AGENDA: <br />There were no changes to the agenda. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.