My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/27/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
01/27/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 12:58:38 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/27/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />City Council Meeting <br />UDOR Site Plan Review <br />January 27, 2003 <br />P arking/Access /Traffic <br />UDOR is a warehouse -type facility with approximately 2,000 sq.ft. of office space. <br />However, parking requirements for the initial building approved in 1994 were based <br />solely on warehouse use and square footage (1 stall for each 2,000 sq.ft.). The parking <br />calculations made at that time were for 6,000 sq.ft. of warehouse and 6,000 sq.ft. of <br />future warehouse expansion, for a total of 12,000 sq.ft. of warehouse. Thus, 6 parking <br />stalls were required, with 7 stalls actually constructed. As a result, parking for the <br />proposed 3,600 sq.ft. addition has already been provided for. The applicant reports that <br />there are actually eight stalls at the site and that parking is not a problem. The applicant <br />further reports that there are seven employees at the company, with no additional <br />employees proposed. <br />Access to the site is via a shared access driveway off Apollo Drive, which is a County <br />road. As a result, plans have been forwarded to Anoka County for review. <br />• <br />Lighting <br />There is no additional lighting proposed for the addition or site. <br />Landscaping <br />• <br />City Code allows impervious site coverage up to 90 %, and the proposed addition is <br />within this requirement. <br />Approval of the initial building in 1994 came with the following requirement: <br />"Following completion of the proposed expansion, plantings will be located to the <br />rear of the property line to provide an appealing view from I -35W." <br />Since this second expansion appears to use the space limits of the site, with no room for <br />further expansion in the future, it is now appropriate to require the landscaping be done. <br />As a result, the applicant has proposed planting 11 trees of various varieties (oak, maple, <br />spruce) in the buffer area between the proposed addition and 35W. <br />Additionally, there is a ponding area on the site, to the southwest of the proposed <br />addition. This should be protected with silt fencing during construction <br />Grading/Drainage <br />3 <br />Item 7B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.