My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/10/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
02/10/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2014 4:07:52 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 12:08:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/10/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM 7 D <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br />C. C. MEETING DATE: February 10, 2003 <br />TOPIC: <br />Resolution No. 17 -03 Denying Minor Subdivision, <br />NE 1/a NE 1/4 of Section 9 <br />SSR & W Development, LLC (Willard Morton) <br />VOTE: 3/5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Mr. Willard Morton's firm, SSR & W Development, LLC, owns property in Lino Lakes. <br />The SSR & W property includes 80+ acres in Section 9. The application is to split off 11 <br />acres from an existing 40 -acres parcel, and combine the new 11 -acre piece with a one - <br />acre strip that connects to Main St. SSR & W would then sell the new lot to allow for a <br />new home site. Staff understands that Mr. Brad Racutt wants to buy the property and <br />build a new home. <br />The application raised numerous important issues regarding implementation of the long - <br />range plan for the City, as represented in the comprehensive plan. The City Council <br />discussed this application at its work session on November 20, 2001. Staff prepared an <br />option that included the dedication of a partial right of way. Mr. Racutt rejected the <br />option, and both he and Mr. Morton waived the statutory deadlines for City action on the <br />application. <br />On January 9, 2003, we received a letter that rescinded that waiver and re- started the <br />period allowed for City action. On January 21 we received a request for approval of the <br />minor subdivision with the partial easement. <br />Since February of 2002, we have prepared a new subdivision ordinance and several <br />issues have arisen that have led to new information and increased awareness of potential <br />problems with the partial right of way option. Because of what we have learned in the <br />past year, staff no longer considers the partial easement a viable alternative. Therefore, <br />we are recommending denial of the minor subdivision application because there is <br />inadequate frontage on a public road. A complete discussion of the issues can be found <br />in this report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.