My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/10/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
02/10/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2014 4:07:52 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 12:08:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/10/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SSR & W Minor Subdivision <br />page 2 <br />ANALYSIS <br />The land use and zoning are shown in the following table. <br />The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density sewered residential development. <br />That is, the long -range plan for the site and much of its immediate area is to serve it with <br />utilities to allow for residential development. It is in a stage 2 area, so utilities will not be <br />available until after year 2010. <br />There is a conceptual greenway indicated over much of the area. A greenway is an area <br />that may be appropriate as protected open space because of environmental features. <br />Greenways are conceptual because creating them is opportunity based: short of actually <br />purchasing the land, the City must depend on the development proposals submitted. The <br />long -range plan for a road in the area will, at the appropriate time, need to consider the <br />potential for preserving a greenway. <br />Zoning, Subdivision Requirements <br />Lot Size: The site is zoned Rural, with a minimum lot size of 10 acres with a <br />minimum of 20% upland. The proposal meets these requirements. <br />Frontage: The City's subdivision ordinance requires all lots to have their full <br />frontage on a publicly dedicated street (Sec. 1001.08 Subd. 6(1)). The intent is to prevent <br />flag lots and provide for safe, efficient access and circulation within the City, including <br />adequate police and fire department access. The need for access and circulation exists <br />not only to a particular piece of property, but for surrounding property as well. <br />In past discussions regarding this application, City staff suggested creating a partial road <br />easement along the eastern edge of the property, including the one -acre strip leading to <br />Main St. Under this option, the City would allow the two properties to use the easement <br />but not open it to the public. Mr. Racutt rejected this option. <br />Since then, staff has considered a wide variety of issues as part of writing a new <br />subdivision ordinance and revising the zoning ordinance. Many of the issues relate to <br />new development, easements, road dedications, and public safety issues. <br />According to the City Attorney, the City is not obligated to open an easement to the <br />public. Nor is it obligated to construct a road if it has a road easement. However, the <br />Existing Land Use <br />Map <br />New Comprehensive Plan <br />Land Use Map <br />Zoning <br />site <br />Rural <br />Low Dens. Sewered, post -2010 <br />Rural <br />north <br />Rural <br />Low Density Unsewered <br />Rural <br />east <br />Rural <br />Low Dens. Sewered, post -2010 <br />Rural <br />south <br />Rural <br />Low Density Unsewered <br />Rural <br />west <br />Rural <br />_ Low Dens. Sewered, post -2010 <br />Rural <br />The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density sewered residential development. <br />That is, the long -range plan for the site and much of its immediate area is to serve it with <br />utilities to allow for residential development. It is in a stage 2 area, so utilities will not be <br />available until after year 2010. <br />There is a conceptual greenway indicated over much of the area. A greenway is an area <br />that may be appropriate as protected open space because of environmental features. <br />Greenways are conceptual because creating them is opportunity based: short of actually <br />purchasing the land, the City must depend on the development proposals submitted. The <br />long -range plan for a road in the area will, at the appropriate time, need to consider the <br />potential for preserving a greenway. <br />Zoning, Subdivision Requirements <br />Lot Size: The site is zoned Rural, with a minimum lot size of 10 acres with a <br />minimum of 20% upland. The proposal meets these requirements. <br />Frontage: The City's subdivision ordinance requires all lots to have their full <br />frontage on a publicly dedicated street (Sec. 1001.08 Subd. 6(1)). The intent is to prevent <br />flag lots and provide for safe, efficient access and circulation within the City, including <br />adequate police and fire department access. The need for access and circulation exists <br />not only to a particular piece of property, but for surrounding property as well. <br />In past discussions regarding this application, City staff suggested creating a partial road <br />easement along the eastern edge of the property, including the one -acre strip leading to <br />Main St. Under this option, the City would allow the two properties to use the easement <br />but not open it to the public. Mr. Racutt rejected this option. <br />Since then, staff has considered a wide variety of issues as part of writing a new <br />subdivision ordinance and revising the zoning ordinance. Many of the issues relate to <br />new development, easements, road dedications, and public safety issues. <br />According to the City Attorney, the City is not obligated to open an easement to the <br />public. Nor is it obligated to construct a road if it has a road easement. However, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.