My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/12/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
05/12/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2014 3:19:42 PM
Creation date
7/11/2014 11:19:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/12/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Eagle Brook Church <br />May 12, 2003 <br />page 3 <br />This is not to discount residents' concern over additional traffic. However, additional <br />traffic will occur with or without the church. In fact, the existing transportation <br />infrastructure is inadequate to handle the development planned by the communities of <br />Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Columbus Twp., not to mention possible development in <br />Centerville. Recent discussion of a professional sports stadium and related development <br />in the immediate vicinity represents an extreme case of major infrastructure <br />reconstruction. Clearly, the road capacity issue cannot be resolved by Eagle Brook <br />Church. <br />One of the purposes of an EAW is to identify possible mitigation measures. At a <br />minimum, the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, and the Minnesota Dept. of <br />Transportation all must cooperate to address the problem. This also should include <br />Columbus Twp., Hugo, Centerville, and Washington County because they will affect and <br />be affected by the transportation infrastructure in the immediate vicinity of the proposed <br />project. All of these jurisdictions are discussing how to address the roadway issues that <br />are known to all of them and highlighted by this EAW. <br />The proposed church project does not create this problem of inadequate infrastructure. <br />The church project is simply the first one to confront the problem. The next development <br />project will face the exact same traffic issues, but on a day -to -day basis during the week. <br />Such impacts likely would be greater than the traffic generated by the proposed church. <br />The church has proposed the temporary mitigative measure of traffic control personnel at <br />the affected locations: Main St. and 20`h Ave., the freeway ramps, and the entrance to the <br />site. As part of redesigning the site plans, the City and Anoka County will work with the <br />project proposer to examine access options such as access roads rather than just <br />driveways onto 20`h Ave. <br />The solution lies in a cooperative study of the land use in the area and the transportation <br />infrastructure needed to support it. The problem can be corrected through cooperative <br />infrastructure improvements by the numerous regulatory authorities involved in planning <br />the infrastructure. <br />Stormwater Management: Water quality questions are best addressed through the <br />design of stormwater facilities. In the case of the proposed church, the design <br />incorporates numerous elements known as best management practices, or BMPs. These <br />include rain gardens, overland runoff, and swales, as well as native plantings around <br />wetlands and on a large area (40+ acres) of the site intended for prairie grasses. The <br />existing woodlands along the lake will remain undisturbed. <br />The original plan was to leave the existing "ditch" underground. The EAW analysis <br />resulted in a probable redesign to bring the ditch to the surface —to "daylight" it and <br />realign it to improve the ability to maintain flow through the site. This likely will be an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.