My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/12/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
05/12/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2014 3:19:42 PM
Creation date
7/11/2014 11:19:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/12/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Eagle Brook Church <br />May 12, 2003 <br />page 4 <br />improvement over the existing situation, and would be done according to the <br />requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />The Watershed states that is has no significant concerns about stormwater management. <br />The grading plan and stormwater management design are subject to review by the <br />Watershed and the City. Thus, the public regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over <br />stormwater management, including the ditch, will address possible impact questions. <br />Wetlands: The several existing wetlands on the site would experience no permanent <br />impacts. The Rice Creek Watershed District, the regulatory agency with jurisdiction over <br />wetlands, states that is has no significant concerns about wetland impacts. The grading <br />plan and stormwater management design will indicate possible wetland impacts. These <br />are subject to review by the Watershed and the City. Thus, the public regulatory agency <br />with jurisdiction over the wetlands will address possible impact questions. <br />Visual: Several comment letters included concerns about the visual impact of <br />lighting and of a tall church spire. The City restricts lighting with provisions in the new <br />zoning ordinance. Lighting must use 90 degree cutoff fixtures (e.g., shoebox type). All <br />applications must include a photometric plan showing the lighting brightness across the <br />property. Lighting can be no greater than 0.4 foot candles at a property line shared with a <br />residential property. The limit is 1.0 foot candles at a road centerline. <br />The other visual issue raised is the proposed 80 ft. spire. As can be seen in the building <br />elevation attached to the response document, the "spire" is a decorative element rising 20 <br />ft. above the pier, which is the tallest part of the actual building (60 ft.). The spire is not a <br />belfry or tower like many churches have. Though the final design is unfinished, the spire <br />may be a cross or simply a lighted element. <br />As with any site and building plan, the specific architectural elements would be examined <br />as part of the review. It is typical for applicants to work out these details in cooperation <br />with the City prior to final approval. Because a church requires a conditional use permit, <br />there would be a public hearing with final approval by the city council. <br />The new zoning ordinance revisions include a change relative to the issue. Previously, <br />the ordinance granted a blanket exemption from height requirements for church spires. <br />The new ordinance exempts church spires up to 60 feet. The possibility of exceeding this <br />remains in the ordinance, through the granting of a conditional use permit. <br />Therefore, the regulatory authority of the City will be used to address the visual impact <br />questions. <br />SUMMARY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.