My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2000 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
02/09/2000 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2014 12:58:39 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 10:14:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
02/09/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 9, 2000 <br />Page 8 <br />be appropriate for this lake. He advised of the education that has been occurring <br />regarding the damage caused by fertilizers and progress made in that regard. Chair Schaps <br />stated this is a recreational lake and he does not believe this condition would be fair to <br />impose on the applicant. <br />Mr. Corson suggested that during the construction period they be required to place silt <br />fence to eliminate sedimentation into the lake. Mr. Vanderlik stated they would not <br />object but do intend to start construction shortly so there may be some problem with <br />installing silt fence posts into the frozen ground. He stated it is their intent to leave the <br />surrounding ground natural but it is the property owner's decision with regard to what <br />happens to the groundcover after construction. He noted that this land has very little <br />slope. <br />Mr. Corson noted that the erosion control could be installed in the newly placed fill which <br />would not be frozen. <br />Chair Schaps suggested the applicant talk with several rs regarding the high <br />water level. <br />Ms. Lane noted the comment from the DNR sa t d of object subject to the lake <br />setback being maximized and placing the v er. Mr. Smyser explained that <br />the DNR approved the City's Shoreline l inan but the City does have the authority to <br />grant the variance. He advised that st e a supplemental report to convey the <br />Boardmember's comments regards o the City Council. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION <br />single - family home at 675 <br />High Water Level of <br />conditions: <br />e variance request to allow construction of a <br />adow Lake Drive within 100 feet of the Ordinary <br />based on findings as indicated and on the following <br />1. The home cted at the 30 -foot front setback line with a varied lake <br />setback of 7 et to 84 feet. <br />2. A revised sur ey document is provided for building permit purposes. <br />The MOTION was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />This item will go before the City Council Monday, February 14, 2000, 6:30 p.m. <br />E. Anoka County Parks, Beach Improvements, Centerville Lake <br />Staff stated the application from Anoka County Parks is for a Site and Building Plan <br />Review for four structures on the west side of Centerville Lake which is within the Rice <br />Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. The Park is zoned PSP, Public Semi - <br />Public. Public parks and recreational facilities as well as all public county government <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />NI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.