04/12/2000 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2000 Page 5 1. The proposed addition be located ten feet south of the existing Maple tree to minimize the variance required on the south/east corner. 2. The proposed addition be sided to match the existing house and garage. The motion was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. C. Rick Carlson, 62nd Street, Minor Subdivision Staff advised that the property owners at 599 and 607 62nd Street are requesting a minor subdivision to allow their homes to be split from the balance of their property which has been purchased by Mr. Carlson and is intended for future development. The property is currently zoned Rural and guided for low density sewer residential in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Staff reviewed the past action to approve a minor subdivision for the Junes property that split the parcel into three pieces. Parc as dedicated to the City for park as a part of the Miller's South Glen Plat with dedication credit for future development. This park land was added to B. wo 'es Park. Parcel B was retained by the Junes and contains their existin: parcel C was retained by Mr. Carlson for future development. Following r. Carlson secured a purchase agreement with the Rehbeins at 607 • t ®t (` cels E and F) and proceeded to plat that property and the Junes Parcel C . dow Ponds. That development was approved by the Planning and Zonin oarY a d continued at the November 23, 1998 City Council meeting. Mr. Carl ' es tly requested a delay in Council action which is still pending. Staff advised of the size of e d requirement for at least 20% of upland. The City Engineer is recomme ice:• tal of 40 foot of right -of -way north of the 62nd Street centerline. This will r tal of a new survey document prior to Council action dedicating an additiona feet along Parcels B, E, and F for future reconstruction of 62nd Street. Thi should provide one acre exclusive of right -of -way for Parcel E. Staff re approval of this minor subdivision as provided for within the Zoning Ordinance e two conditions. Chair Schaps asked if you can combine two parcels to get above the ten acre limit. He noted you can reduce the size of a lot to one acre as long as the remaining lot is ten acres or served by public water and sewer. He asked if each parcel will comply under this 10 acre limit. Ms. Wyland stated they will not. Mr. Smyser explained each of the two existing houses can be on a lot smaller than the ten acres according to an exception stated in the Code. Chair Schaps asked if Parcels B and C could request to split off Parcel C. Ms. Wyland stated in that case, Staff would recommend Parcel C be combined with the parcel to the north. She explained the intention is to hold the property until public water and sewer is available.