Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 9, 2000 <br />Page 4 <br />reported that Lino Lakes' grant was highly ranked by the Metropolitan Council and the <br />final funding decision will be made next month. <br />Mr. Rafferty suggested that continuing the public hearing would not result in a formal <br />approval but would show support of endorsement. He asked if the Metropolitan Council <br />requires the document to be finalized and stated the Board met for two and one -half <br />months several times to discuss these issues and held public hearings on the town center <br />but made no major changes were made. Mr. Rafferty stated he felt the presentation by <br />Mr. Fefercorn took the project intention in another direction. <br />Mr. Wessel clarified nothing improper is being done and staff is not suggesting adoption <br />but, rather, endorsement. He explained this is the public input portion of the process and <br />the City has been following a very public process with the grant application. However, <br />the work is behind schedule and this issue needs to be moved forward. Mr. Wessel stated <br />the planning funds to develop these standards makes it posse eligible for the <br />implementation funds. The review for the implementation rrently underway <br />and would totally fund the implementation of the livabl <br />Wessel stated in early September, the next cut will b <br />that the Lino Lakes grant is currently ranked numb <br />Center is vital and the staff request is for an in <br />presented to the City Council. He noted th <br />standards, even following the Council's e orse nt. <br />s regulations. Mr. <br />grant funding, advising <br />ated he believes the Town <br />f a ' ection which can be <br />can continue to occur to the <br />Chair Schaps agreed the considera <br />ordinance will be presented bef e <br />forum to raise the valid conc <br />endorsement statement be e <br />draft" Town Center st <br />requirements. <br />rsement only, noting the zoning <br />rior to adoption which will provide another <br />been expressed tonight. He suggested the <br />o indicate the endorsement is of the "preliminary and <br />at the City may revise specific "language and" <br />Staff indicated the language would be acceptable. <br />Chair Schaps stated ile he is comfortable with the basic framework of the standards, <br />there are issues that remain unresolved, such as the sign regulations. <br />In response to Mr. Zych, Mr. Wessel explained that the Comprehensive Plan was to have <br />been adopted by December of 1998, however that has not occurred. He stated that while <br />it would be best to have the Comprehensive Plan in place prior to ordinance amendments, <br />that may not occur and this process needs to move forward. <br />Ms. Lane indicated her support to endorse the standards. She asked if the normal process <br />would be followed for these considerations, to assure the Board is included in that <br />process. Mr. Smyser stated the Board will be included in that process. Ms. Lane asked <br />that the Board receive updates as that process is followed. <br />• <br />• <br />