Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 13, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br />Mr. Rafferty noted the five -acre requirement and criteria of hardship on the owner based <br />on the size of the lot. He stated it clearly appears that beyond the western half of the <br />property, it is not buildable for anything. Directly to the north, it is clearly all wetland. <br />Mr. Rafferty noted the City goes the extra mile to get permissions from the neighbors so <br />they are aware of the request, but the ordinance draws some "lines in the sand" to protect <br />the interests of the City for future development. Mr. Rafferty stated he spoke with the <br />surrounding land owners and one neighbor, who has a large investment, stated he has <br />seen these plans and agrees with the request if the pole barn is located on the southern <br />portion. Mr. Rafferty asked if the front elevation would contain a formal setting such as a <br />concrete apron. <br />Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. <br />Chris Lyden, applicant, stated it was not his plan to put a slab t of the building but <br />he has been considering some type of apron that the overhe uld come down on. <br />He stated if it is the consent of the Board that a slab sh he would do so. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated his concern that the front elevat <br />passerby. He suggested that a two to three foo <br />Rafferty reviewed the recent request from t <br />costs of the structure with a metal seam r <br />Mr. Schilling arrived at 6:43 p.m. <br />formal appearance to the <br />oul ".rovide that aspect. Mr. <br />Bank and inquired about the <br />Mr. Lyden stated the issue is �k� ••st, but one of providing a quality building for <br />his antique boat. He explrt construction as proposed would be more costly and he <br />believes a wood type s •t a concrete floor, due to its weight, is not appropriate <br />for the site due to the tl : <br />