My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/13/2000 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
12/13/2000 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 11:06:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/13/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 13, 2000 <br />Page 8 <br />approved an addition of 2,400 square feet in July of 1999. One of the conditions of <br />approval was that two existing accessory buildings be removed prior to construction of <br />the new addition. However, that did not occur. The accessory building were built <br />without a building permit. Gordy Johnson of UDOR wants to replace one of the <br />accessory buildings with a new one. <br />Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting it has concluded that accessory buildings <br />are not allowed in the GI district under the current zoning ordinance. Under Minnesota <br />Statutes 15.99, if the City denies an application it must state in writing the reasons for the <br />denial at the time that it denies the application. <br />Mr. Smyser stated if the applicant agrees to an extension of the review period, an option <br />is available to apply for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow accessory <br />buildings in the Industrial Zone. Staff recommends the item be tabled if the applicant <br />agrees with an extension so that alternative can be researched ° myser estimated that <br />it may take two to three months to complete such an ordin.. am +ment. <br />Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to <br />Gordy Johnson, applicant, stated that option is . ale t` i <br />Mr. Johnson asked why additional storag . Gordy Johnson reviewed the <br />history of this business, its growth, a o ldings were constructed. Discussion <br />occurred regarding the location an uildings. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated the Boar <br />recent past. He noted this <br />will result in beautific <br />Mr. Smyser revie <br />districts. <br />bout outdoor storage for equipment in the <br />is making an extra effort to construct something that <br />t rather than outdoor fenced storage. <br />discussion related to outdoor storage in other zoning <br />Mr. Rafferty asked i v is business area contains outdoor dumpsters. Gordy Johnson <br />stated dumpsters are everywhere in the Apollo Business Park and he even took pictures of <br />outdoor dumpsters and pallets last summer which he provided to staff. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if there is a way to allow the applicant to construct an attached <br />addition. Gordy Johnson stated there is a separation due to the sprinkler connection for <br />the Fire Department, however, he may be able to find a way to connect the buildings. <br />Gordy Johnson stated his agreement to an extension of the review period. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to table consideration of the site plan request of UDOR to <br />construct an accessory storage building on the UDOR site at 500 Apollo Drive to allow <br />for a separate application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to be processed, and <br />was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0 -1 (Schilling due to his absence during <br />a portion of the discussion). <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.