12/13/2000 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 9 Discussion occurred regarding options for connecting the structures, exterior building materials, and need to involve the Fire Department to gain their input. Mr. Smyser stated the zoning amendment will be on the January 10, 2000 Planning & Zoning Board meeting agenda. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recess at 8:03 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 5 -0. Chair Schaps called the meeting back to order at 8:12 p.m. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Saddle Club — Revised Concept Plan Staff reviewed the Board's past consideration of the Sa development and indication the plan did not justify t compared to standard R -1 zoning. Staff advised th concept plan that corresponds with standard zo comparison of the two concept drawings Staff identified the location of the zoning change. It was noted staff parcel is no longer split by MU reduced number of lots and e Drive that had been propo Mr. Johnson asked if t Smyser answered no longer be conn ch of a planned ensity on the site per has submitted a new esented a summary of the revised plan. ea of the MUSA boundary and d that be remedied so the single tax . Staff noted the revised concept plan has a road connecting Old Birch Street with Kildeer he previous concept plan. east comer of the subject site would be landlocked. Mr. y and noted the location of existing trailways which would the revised plan. Chair Schaps noted t ere are trails all over Lino Lakes and asked why a trail is not being proposed that is similar to the original concept plan. Mr. Smyser noted the lot boundaries now extend to the edges of the plat so it would be difficult to create trails unless they are located within the private property. Mr. Rafferty noted the lots could be made less deep to accommodate trails. Chair Schaps stated there is a need for open space. Mr. Smyser noted the long length of the dead end street with the new concept plan and need to extend utilities down Old Birch Street to serve this property. He pointed out the location of the 500 -foot high tower on the neighboring property and issue raised with ice loading as a potential danger. Mr. Smyser stated he contacted Shoreview and learned that they require the tower owner to carry additional insurance should ice fall from the tower and cause damage.