04/11/2001 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2001 Page 10 Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to continue to public hearing to May 9, 2001 to allow time for additional information to be submitted and reviewed, and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Heritage Development, Saddle Club Site, Old Birch Street, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat. Staff stated the design issues had not been resolved and recommended the public hearing be continued to May 9, 2001. John Hill, Heritage Development, stated they had submitted the new plans on Monday and they would be presented at the May meeting. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue to public hearing to May 9, 2001 to allow time for additional information to be submitted and reviewed, and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target), Lake Drive. Mr. Smyser stated the design issues had not been resolved and recommended the public hearing be continued to May 9, 2001. They had received the plans this week and this would be presented at the May meeting. He stated Target would still be there, but instead of the smaller sites, this was proposed for a Kohl's store. He indicated he had received positive feedback with the proposed Kohl's store. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to May 9, 2001, to allow time for additional information to be submitted, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. E. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Land Hold Group, 12th & Holly, Preliminary Plat. Staff stated the design issues had not been resolved and recommended the public hearing be continued to May 9, 2001. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to May 9, 2001, to allow time for additional information to be submitted, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 5 -0. F. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Tree Preservation Ordinance. Staff stated at the February meeting, the discussion and public hearing was continued to the April meeting. It was discovered that the unresolved issues for a new tree preservation Ordinance would require significant time and effort. Staff could not predict when they will be able to address the issues. Therefore, staff recommended closing the public hearing. Mr. Lyden asked why the public hearing was being closed. Mr. Schaps replied it was not ready to go forward and this would be brought forward again at a future date and a public hearing would be held at that time. • • •