Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 11, 2001 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />G. Comprehensive Plan: Recommendation for City Council. <br />Mr. Lyden stated there were a number of items he personally needed to look at to make a rational <br />decision and requested they obtain information from all of the Boards, which they had not been <br />able to do. He suggested receiving the information he needed by next week and having a special <br />meeting regarding this Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mr. Smyser stated the process would be to have a public hearing in the future, but right now the <br />City Council was asking for comments from the P &Z Board at this time. The Council had <br />requested to receive comments by the end of this week. <br />The Board continued this discussion to Thursday, April 19, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Mini Storage, Al Robinson, Tabled from March 13, 2001 Meeting <br />• <br />Staff stated their research indicated that industrially -zoned land was most suitable for mini - <br />storage. Land that was zoned for commercial uses was a possibility, but this land would be <br />better suited for higher value uses. Mini - storage was no usually allowed in agricultural or rural <br />residential zoning districts. The rational behind this was as follows: 1. The purpose of the rural <br />districts was to preserve agricultural land and provide some residential use at rural densities. <br />Mini - storage was no consistent with that purpose. 2. The rural districts cover a very large <br />geographic area Therefore, allowing mini - storage in rural districts would have a far- reaching <br />impact on the City and contained the potential for many land use conflicts. 3. If mini - storage <br />was built, it could interfere with future land use planning in areas that were not specifically <br />earmarked for commercial or industrial growth. In light of the previous discussion, it would <br />appear that mini - storage was most suitable in industrial districts and potentially the R -BR <br />district. In Lino Lakes, the R -BR, Rural- Business Reserve District, was a district that could <br />potentially contain mini - storage as an interim use until the land was rezoned, or the mini - storage <br />could remain if the land was rezoned to an industrial district. A disadvantage of allowing mini - <br />storage in the R -BR District was the possibility that it could hinder the extension of utilities in <br />the future. Issues to be considered for mini- storage included green space, landscaping, building <br />coverage, paving, security systems, and building appearance. Building appearance may include <br />regulation of exterior building materials and requiring that the garage doors be oriented to the <br />interior of the property. Requiring a high - quality appearance would go a long way toward <br />improving the value of theproperty. Performance standards should not be compromised. The <br />City had few to no existing mini - storage uses and now was the time to set a high - quality standard <br />that could be maintained in the future. <br />• The Board stated they wanted to wait until Mr. Robinson was present to discuss this further. <br />