Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 9, 2001 <br />Page 20 <br />and Zoning Board reviewed the concept plan for the site in December of 2000 and opened <br />the public hearing on February 13, 2001. The main issues raised by staff, and discussed <br />by the City Council and Planning and Zoning Board at the concept stage related to the site <br />layout and design and the departure from the Town Center vision. The direction provided <br />through the concept process was to incorporate special pedestrian- oriented design <br />features, as well as some special architectural elements into the proposal with the goal <br />being an "above average shopping center." Staff advised that the submittal that was <br />reviewed in February 2001 has been modified; this review is based on plan submittals <br />stamped received by the City on April 9, 2001. <br />Staff explained that because there are many outstanding issues related to the site and it is <br />anticipated that revised plans will be submitted, the degree of detail is limited in their <br />report. Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the project data, acreages, and <br />square footages of proposed uses and development issues as detailed in the staff report. <br />Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Board discuss the site plan, building <br />design and signs proposed, provide direction to the applicants and then continue the <br />public hearing until such time as the EAW process is complete and wetland fill and <br />mitigation plans are approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District and more <br />information is submitted related to access, vehicle and pedestrian circulation, screening, <br />engineering comments, signage, building design and materials, and any other issues <br />raised as the process moves forward. <br />Mr. Powell advised that a petition for utilities was received today. <br />Mr. Wessel stated this project is large and complicated, and Ryan Companies is putting <br />this project together in a third the normal time needed for a development of this size. He <br />noted staff is recommending a continuation for many good reasons due to "holes" in the <br />application and the responsibility lies with the developer to provide that information. Mr. <br />Wessel stated the developer has made a good effort but the schedule is very accelerated <br />and if the City wants it to go, would necessitate Board action on June 13, Council action <br />on July 23, the land to close in August, and construction to begin this September. He <br />noted that an enormous amount of work remains for the applicant to complete. <br />Mr. Wessel stated the Council has looked at the design as it is being presented and been <br />active in reviewing this proposal. <br />Chair Schaps stated the Board could give direction but the opportunity to do so is limited <br />in timing compared to the Council's review process. <br />Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. <br />Tom Palmquist, representing Ryan Companies, introduced the design team including <br />John Payton and Bill Wittrock. He stated his concurrence with staff that a lot of work <br />needs to be done in a short amount of time. He stated there are changes being made that <br />will have to be incorporated into the plans by next week. <br />