Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 9, 2001 <br />Page 21 <br />Mr. Palmquist stated their submittal package contained a schedule with a draft EAW <br />submission on May 1 lth with a 30 day comment period ending in June and Council <br />action on July 11. He stated two Type 3 wetlands have been identified and they will not <br />be impacted. The 6.36 acre Type 2 wetland is a low quality and will be mitigated on a <br />2:1 basis (7.62 acres) which they will pursue with Anoka County. He advised that a <br />portion of the wetlands will be mitigated on the Chomonix Golf Course, camp ground, <br />and other areas. Mr. Palmquist stated they are scheduled to meet with Anoka County <br />park staff and the County Attorney to draft the needed legal documentation. It will be <br />heard by the Anoka County Park and Recreation Board on June 5 and formal action taken <br />by the County Board on June 12. He advised that plans were completed today and will be <br />submitted on or before May 11. The Rice Creek Watershed District action will occur in <br />late -July and the 404 Army Corp permit will follow in two weeks of the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District action. <br />Mr. Corson asked what the Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department has to do <br />with the mitigation requirement. Mr. Palmquist explained they looked at mitigation <br />options and based on this development proposal, they will mitigate off -site. The options <br />on Anoka County property are being pursued subject to Rice Creek Watershed District <br />approval. <br />Mr. Lyden stated the proposed mitigation will benefit Anoka County property and asked <br />if the mitigation could help City property rather than the County. Mr. Palmquist stated <br />they did explore various options with City staff regarding mitigation and it was <br />determined the County property was potentially suitable. <br />Ms. Lane asked if it is possible to follow the anticipated time schedule given the meeting <br />schedule for the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Council. Mr. Wessel stated <br />it is correct that the recommendation to the Council will probably contain several <br />conditions being subject to approval dates that extend beyond the Council decision date. <br />Ms. Lane asked if the project would continue if there is a month delay. Mr. Palmquist <br />explained that it is critical to close on the property in August so they can get the <br />earthwork completed and the building pad prepared. He explained Target has a certain <br />model they rigidly adhere to indicating they open stores only three times a year. Mr. <br />Palmquist stated that representatives from Target will be in attendance at the next <br />meeting and can better answer that question. <br />Chair Schaps noted the City is usually aware of Rice Creek Watershed District concerns <br />and asked if the City will be aware whether it will be approved prior to their meeting. <br />Mr. Powell stated some plans have not yet been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District and he does not know if they have started a serious review since the wetland <br />replacement plan has not been submitted. <br />Bill Wittrock presented the colored exterior elevations of the proposed Target Store. He <br />stated he has been working on this property with several different property owners, <br />starting with Mr. Rehbine. He stated they have become aware of the Town Center <br />Guidelines and emphasized that everyone recognizes the importance and value of those <br />