Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 21 <br />d. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the <br />City Engineer. <br />e. Outlots A and D, minus the area of land necessary to replace existing park land <br />lost with extension of Arlo Lane, are dedicated in partial satisfaction of park <br />dedication requirements. The balance of required parkland dedication will be <br />provided in the form of cash fee in lieu of land as prescribed by the Subdivision <br />Ordinance. <br />f. Outlots B and C are conveyed to the appropriate landowners for access and a <br />buffer strip, respectively. <br />and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 3 -1 (Lyden). <br />Mr. Zych arrived at 9:50 p.m. <br />The developer stated if this did stay parkland, he would plant additi <br />Judd property and the park. <br />AMENDMENT to the first motion as seconded and approv <br />width within the subdivision as opposed to the 32 -foot wi <br />(Zych). <br />H. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEA' ° ern'an Comp <br />Lake Drive <br />Chair Schaps reopened the public heart <br />Staff presented the application by <br />Inc. on a proposed retail devel <br />Interchange. The Planning <br />of 2000 and opened the <br />initial hearing. <br />es between the <br />d a 28 -foot street <br />ied 3 -1 (Lyden) -1 <br />anies UD, Inc. (Target), <br />f had been working with Ryan Companies, US <br />ocat in the northeast quadrant of Lake Drive/I -35 W. <br />and reviewed the concept plan for the site in December <br />on February 13, 2001 with periodic updates since the <br />Staff stated the main is rnp ed by staff, and discussed by the City Council and Planning and <br />Zoning Board at the con .t stage related to the site layout and design and the departure from the <br />Town Center vision. <br />Staff indicated the direction provided through the concept process was to incorporate special <br />pedestrian- oriented design features, as well as some special architectural elements into the <br />proposal with the goal being an "above average shopping center ". <br />Staff stated the submittal that was reviewed in February 2001 had been modified; this review <br />was based on plan submittals stamped received by the City on May 18, 2001. <br />Staff indicated many outstanding issues remain related to the site. <br />