Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 27 <br />Staff stated the R -1X minimum lot size was 12,825 sf of upland. All of the lots met or exceed <br />this minimum lot size. The proposed lot widths were compliant with the minimum standard of a <br />width of 90 feet for interior lots and 115 feet for corner lots. The minimum lot depth was 135 <br />feet. All the lots except Lot 8 comply with this standard. Lot 8 had a depth of 127 feet, which <br />required a variance. <br />Staff indicated the ordinance stated that in considering requests for variance the City shall make <br />a finding of fact that: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use of used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners was due to physical circumstance unique to his <br />property not created by the landowner. <br />3. That the hardship was not due to economic considera s along,. d when a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the to � o ,tie or• ance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested would not 4°•nf one •plicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by thi o �_� 4�`ce t; ether lands, structures, <br />or buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions would be in •in- with e spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />Staff stated the Planning and Zoning Board ma <br />and it was located at the intersection of tw •, oll <br />basis for granting the variance. <br />that the site was impacted by wetlands <br />s thereby limiting design options as a <br />Staff indicated the applicant had s4 ! • •; ng information that was subject to the review <br />and approval of the City Engine <br />Staff stated an existing sh • • ole b ding were located within the new street right -of -way <br />and must be removed. <br />Staff indicated utilities tes both 12th and Holly, and an extension of utilities down the <br />proposed cul -de -sac was'' "'?. ±roposed. The water main needs to be looped to 12th Street. The <br />utilities plan was subject `'`` City Engineer review and approval. Holly and 12th were both major <br />collector roads. The purpose of major collectors was to channel traffic, and direct access from <br />lots was discouraged. The number of lots fronting on 12th Avenue had been reduced from five <br />lots in the concept plan to one lot in the preliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly <br />Drive had increased from zero to one. The rest of the lots were proposed to front on a new cul- <br />de -sac street. Based on modifications to the plan which reduced the number of accesses staff <br />supported the layout. <br />Staff stated a trail was envisioned along Holly Drive, but had not been designed yet. It had not <br />been decided whether the trail would be on the north or south side of Holly. It would be within <br />the road right -of -way. A trail existed on the east side of 12th Ave. as part of Peregrine Pass. <br />Park dedication for this new development would be cash. <br />Staff stated wetlands exist in the north central and southeast portions of the site. Although the <br />boundaries of wetlands are shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland delineation report had been <br />