Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2001 <br />Page 24 <br />Marilyn Anderson, 8840 Birch Street, stated she had no objection to the development even <br />though it would greatly impact their neighborhood. Her concern was the connection of the sewer <br />and water. She stated it was her last chance to get sewer and water without petitioning for it. <br />She stated four years ago, if they would have connected up to the sewer and water their cost <br />would be $30,000.00 and she was asking for consideration on this at this time. <br />Gary Foster, 882 Old Birch, stated he was not against the development and agreed with Mrs. <br />Anderson regarding the sewer and water. He expressed concern about the Birch Street access <br />and stated they needed to have a study on Birch Street. He stated it was a deadly road and they <br />could not get onto Birch Street during rush hour in the morning. He stated with having an <br />increase in traffic, this would make this area even more unsafe. He stated without any controls <br />on Birch Street, it was a dangerous situation. He stated the safety issue was his biggest concern <br />along with the opportunity to have sewer and water coming through. <br />Birch Street really needed to be done. He stated someone was goin <br />stated he was not against the homes. He asked how they were go <br />ted a study of <br />in this area. He <br />e traffic. <br />Greg Graves, 6532 Killdeer Drive, stated he had lived there o a ears :y. 'd expressed concern <br />the access was not adequate. He believed his neighborhood ed as an access point <br />and this would create a safety issue. He stated the are ,. t: 'ble : d he had problems getting <br />onto Birch Street now and if this went through, this wou increase his wait time. <br />Rick Capocasa, 886 Old Birch Street, stated the would ' e to hook up to sewer and water. He <br />expressed concern regarding the increased f i = d th= dangerous intersection. <br />Eugene Gervais, 890 Old Birch Street hould be a traffic light at the west end. He <br />asked why this project was not sh. . e of the sewer issues. Ms. Lane replied it was <br />because there was a MUSA issu * s ha' .een resolved. <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTI <br />Zych. Motion carried 4 -0. <br />ose "'`e Public hearing at 9:52 p.m., and was supported by Mr. <br />Mr. Corson stated he u there was some additional cost to extend the sewer system, but <br />asked if that additional c t would be assessed to the homeowners. Mr. Powell replied that was <br />not correct and explained `` hat the current rules were with respect to extending the sewer and <br />water to a new development. <br />Mr. Corson asked if the residents were to petition for the utilities, would there be assessments. <br />Mr. Powell stated that may change the situation. If the Council decided they wanted to come <br />from the north, then the City would carry the additional cost for 5 -10 years and they could not <br />expect the developer to pay for that when it was cheaper to come from another direction. <br />However, this was an option. <br />Mr. Corson asked with respect to the 90- degree turn on Killdeer, if that 90- degrees would <br />continue to the south at some point in the future. Mr. Powell stated that was correct and it would <br />then be a "T" intersection. <br />