Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 11, 2001 <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Zych stated he was not comfortable with Mr. Piper's analysis of where a landowner on the <br />other lot would or would not build their home. He stated they did not have an elevation map in <br />which to make those conclusions. Mr. Piper indicated where the natural entrance to the cul -de- <br />sac would be located. <br />Mr. Zych asked if he could bring the garage forward. Mr. Piper relied he would run into the <br />setback from the street and aesthetically it would not look appropriate. <br />Chair Schaps asked if he could go deeper with the garage. Mr. Piper replied he could, but it <br />would be a detached garage. <br />Mr. Hyden asked how this would increase the value of both properties. He stated Mr. Piper's <br />property value would increase, but the future home on the other lot he believed would be <br />decreased. <br />Mr. Piper asked if he could get the variance if he went to 10 feet <br />stated he needed a five -foot setback and if he went 10 feet, the <br />Mr. Smyser <br />d for a variance. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated the variance was clear and he did not se ow ould approve this, <br />lo <br />especially when it would affect any future home on t <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to deny the vari <br />Accessory Building with denial of variance bei <br />neighboring landowner's permission not b <br />Motion carried 5 -0. <br />w a zero side yard setback for an <br />the staff's report, as well as the <br />d was supported by Ms. Lane. <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING - <br />Interim Use Permit, Site Plan <br />Chair Schaps opened the <br />Staff presented the ap <br />existing conditional us <br />site plan review. Staff <br />conditions that were ado <br />, Amended Conditional Use Permit, Amended <br />xplaining applicant had applied for amendments to the <br />CUP), amendments to the existing interim use permit, and for a <br />lained the requested amendments would change several of the <br />ed with previous approvals. The site plan review application was for a <br />new manufacturing building on the site. Staff stated the new building in and of itself required an <br />amendment to the conditional use permit because it differed from what was previously approved. <br />Staff indicated the earliest action in the City's address file was a rezoning in December 1968 and <br />special use permit issued to Molin in January 1969 to construct a concrete plant. The Sherwood <br />Green residential plat was approved in 1978. Amendments to the Molin special use permit were <br />approved for expansions in 1978, 1981, and 1983. In 1984 neighborhood complaints resulted in <br />a task force to study concerns regarding noise, blowing sand, and visual impact. <br />Staff stated a storage building was approved in 1991, and another building addition approved in <br />1993. All the expansions included approvals of amendments to the special/conditional use <br />permit. <br />