Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 14, 2001 <br />Page 3 <br />Staff stated an access management study was prepared for Main Street by Anoka County <br />and participating cities including Lino Lakes. The study, completed in 1999, <br />recommended a full access intersection at West Rondeau Lake Rd. Because W. Rondeau <br />Lake Rd. already existed, this was a logical location. <br />Staff indicated the Metropolitan Council also required the City to preserve right of way to <br />accommodate future development. The road easement dedication recommended by staff <br />along the east edge of the site best responded to this requirement. <br />The proposal submitted by SSR & W was to dedicate additional right of way for Dupont <br />Ave. along the southern edge of the property. This road would not be constructed. The <br />prospective buyer of the new 11 -acre lot would use the one -acre strip for access to Main <br />Street. However, staff stated there were several problems with • .osal. <br />Currently, both Dupont Ave. and Duffee Drive are l righ <br />ran along the southern edge of the site. Duffee Drive <br />corner of the site. The proposed additional easeme <br />Lane. There was no connection to Main Street. <br />Currently, an electric power transmission line eas <br />alignment: the location for the road eas <br />very difficult to convert this location to <br />In contrast, Oak Lane was a full <br />freeway. The option recomme <br />connection. <br />Staff explained muc <br />connection would • , etl 'mod impacts regardless of the alignment. <br />t. wide). Dupont <br />e southeastern <br />along Dupont to Lois <br />ollows the Dupont Ave. <br />posed by the applicant. It would be <br />y now except 200 feet just west of the <br />ould use this to plan the future Main Street <br />the area was wetland. Construction of the future road <br />With respect t:T st." stated access to future development was an important issue. <br />Another import ss was the current access situation for the adjacent landowner. The <br />property at 1196 ` ain Street currently accessed Main Street via a driveway in the one- <br />acre piece. The c rrent residents there, Steve Martichuski and Kathy Matzke, had <br />explained to staff that it was their understanding that a public road was to be constructed <br />there. They indicated to staff that the deed to their property referred to a road easement. <br />For that reason, they oriented their garage to the east, with their driveway connecting to <br />the long driveway that runs to Main Street. <br />Staff indicated the fact that the one -acre piece was 60 feet wide indicated that, sometime <br />in the past, someone planned the strip for a road. However, staff had no information <br />indicating that the City had any rights or ownership in the property now. <br />Staff explained if the City was to implement its long range plan, as represented in the <br />2001 comprehensive plan, it must recognize opportunities to put together the individual <br />pieces. The 2001 comprehensive plan, the transportation plan, which was a key element, <br />and the 1999 access management plan all point to providing for a future road connection. <br />This would provide safe access and circulation for existing properties and for future <br />