My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/1999 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1999
>
10/13/1999 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
7/15/2014 1:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/13/1999
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 13, 1999 <br />Page 7 <br />Mr. Johnson stated the traffic on Main Street will steadily increase with or without the <br />development. Main Street is going to be a major road. He stated that the drainage is a <br />regional problem and a solution is needed. He asked how the drainage will be affected in <br />Highland Meadows and who pays for the improvements to the ditch. He agreed that the <br />density should be lower and suggested a cluster design. <br />Staff advised the drainage is a regional problem. The Highland Meadows development <br />has been split regarding drainage. A portion of the development drains to the southeast. <br />The City charges developers for drainage issues and improvements. <br />Ms. Lane stated cluster housing is a good option. She stated drainage and traffic is a <br />major concern. The residents have very valid concerns. The plan needs more work. She <br />added that the City needs an east/west roadway north of 694. <br />Mr. Corson added that traffic is an issue that isn't going to <br />uickly. Main Street <br />is a major concern and drainage should be looked at as ' • lem. <br />Ms. Carlson requested staff provide information of u for Main Street and the <br />proposed road on the south end of the subdivis' as d if there are any traffic <br />control plans made by the school relating is • acre:' She stated the County needs to <br />address the danger of Main Street. She r vironmental Board's comments <br />relating to this project. She stated th ,�� a� a preservation development that is <br />being developed. She asked for cod` the developer to resolve all issues. <br />Chair Schaps stated the deve <br />need to be patient and cou <br />needs to be found. Th <br />that access on Wood <br />right to develop. The residents and developer <br />here are concerns on both sides and middle ground <br />eeds to continue working with the Church. He noted <br />ail would be much more acceptable to the Board. <br />VI. DISCUSSION I <br />A. Site Plan Resew - relocated structures (garages) <br />Staff advised the City occasionally receives requests from property owners to move <br />structures into the City. In the past the City has required a site plan review for any <br />relocated structure whether a single family dwelling or a detached accessory building <br />larger that 120 square feet in size. Staff read the section of ordinance that pertains to this <br />situation. <br />Staff advised they believe the section of the ordinance could be interpreted to apply only <br />to a "vacant lot ". Therefore, a developed site, already containing a single family home, <br />may not apply. When a request involves a relocated garage, staff would still require a <br />building permit and inspection by the building department to insure compliance with <br />applicable building codes. However, staff would prefer to eliminate the site plan review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.