11/10/1999 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

p • • Planning & Zoning Board November 10, 1999 Page 3 hearing and heard comments. A number of citizens expressed concerns regarding the project. Several objected to the nature of the size and nature of the project. Other concerns included traffic, impact on the lake, and compatibility with the area. The public hearing was continued. On the advice of the Board, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting several weeks later. Ms. Sherman reviewed the site plan review and analysis in detail. She advised the site plan meets all of the ordinance regulations for the R -X District and the Shoreland Area. The criteria outlined for Conditional Use are designed to assure that a proposed use is appropriate in a specific location. If the Board finds the criteria/standards are satisfied then a recommendation to grant the conditional use would be appropriate in conjunction with approval of the site plan. Ms. Sherman noted she will recommend several conditions if the conditional use permit is granted. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:45 p.m. Chair Schaps asked if the applicant will provide a pave will dedicate a trail easement to the City. The churc will remain a wood chip trail until the City has the City cannot require park dedication because th Chair Schaps asked for staff to comment indicated the proposed building is ve building and it is very large. It is area. The proposed athletic co the area and should weigh in Mr. Johnson asked if t the County has asked Mr. Johnson expr be a lot of pedestria having a trail develo dvised the church the trail. The trail ve it. Staff noted the of being subdivided. le and intensity of the project. Staff the appearance of an industrial cture with 216 parking spaces in a rural ediate north, will change the flavor of ovision for a trail on Centerville Road. Staff advised tonal right -of -way but there are not plans for a trail. ern regarding safety on Centerville Road because there will affic. Staff advised the Park Board did not express any interest in d there. Mr. Johnson referred to the list of conditions. He asked if any of the conditions will result in a significant change in the size of the building. Staff advised the applicant has already made good progress on the listed conditions. None of the conditions are a major issue and the applicant has indicated compliance. Mr. Dunn expressed concern about Phase II of the project, traffic patterns, and the environmental impact of the project. He asked if Phase II was considered in this plan or if that application will stand alone. Ms. Sherman stated staff did review Phase II in general but not in detail. The City will be able to consider additional conditions for the plan when the applicant asked for approval for Phase II.