Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 14, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br />existing structures, adding an antenna could not extend above the existing structure more <br />than the height allowance for that zoning district. <br />Mr. Johnson then asked about criteria for use in considering conditional use permit <br />applications. Mr. Brixius stated that in his opinion demonstration of need would have to <br />be established, and that details of that criteria could be fleshed out if desired. <br />Subsequent sections provide less restrictive requirements for R and R -X areas, which <br />would be permitted personal wireless service antennas as permitted secondary uses, <br />accessory antennas, commercial and public radio /TV and public utility microwave <br />antennas. <br />With respect to industrial and public /semi - public areas, personal wireless antennas will be <br />allowed on support structures as permitted secondary use, and accessory antennas will be <br />allowed as permitted accessory use. The reference to commercial radio antennas should <br />be eliminated, as they will not be allowed as conditional use within commercial districts. <br />Reference to commercial radio antennas should be eliminated, as commercial <br />broadcasting antennas will not be allowed as permitted use within commercial districts. <br />However, additional information is required prior to final decision with regard to what <br />will be permitted within commercial districts. <br />Mr. Wessel indicated that he would bring the issue of antenna towers within industrial <br />districts before EDAB on February 5. Questions which will be considered are whether or <br />not they would be somehow intrusive and possibly inhibit development, and whether or <br />not they would be appropriate in zones adjacent to residential areas. He added that he <br />would bring EDAB's recommendation back to the next meeting of the Planning & <br />Zoning Board. <br />Chair Schaps asked where Lino Lakes is in relation to other cities in the area. Mr. <br />Brixius stated that the concerns of Lino Lakes are not unique. Chair Schaps asked if <br />there are others who have already dealt with the issues and, having gone through the <br />learning experience, could perhaps be used as models. Mr. Brixius mentioned Lakeville, <br />Plymouth and New Hope, all of which have been considered for location of <br />telecommunications facilities, but none of which have ordinances in place. He added that <br />it is not uncommon for providers to look to industrial areas for location of towers and <br />antennas, and that target areas are interstate corridors first with expansion into other <br />areas. <br />Mr. Herr asked if a technical study is planned. He pointed out that the City of <br />Bloomington has put together significant information which it has already shared with <br />approximately 80 communities. However, since Lino Lakes has no opportunity for <br />locating antennas on buildings, it cannot compare to cities such as Bloomington except to <br />get an idea of the additional challenges for this community in providing adequate service <br />coverage. Mr. Brixius mentioned a collaboration by the northwestern suburban <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />a <br />