My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/14/1998 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
01/14/1998 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:22:35 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 8:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
01/14/1998
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 14, 1998 <br />Page 9 <br />communities who wanted to establish a model so that they could offer similar standards <br />to prospective service providers. The language in the proposed ordinance embodies that <br />of these other communities. <br />Mr. Herr asked if the 100- to 120 -foot height requirement currently being proposed is <br />adequate to provide service for a 2 -mile radius area. Mr. Brixius indicated that in other <br />rural areas similar to Lino Lakes 160 -foot antennas provides much more extensive <br />coverage than the 2 -mile radius. <br />Chair Schaps asked how many antennas /towers Lino Lakes might expect. Mr. Brixius <br />explained that a figure has not been determined, and that the total number of antennas <br />will depend greatly upon how many providers come into the area. <br />Mr. Herr pointed out that Bloomington currently accommodates six providers with three <br />additional applications pending. He added that he was informed it is unlikely that more <br />than three providers can be located on a given structure. <br />Mr. Dunn first requested clarification as to the definition of "tower ". He then asked if <br />there are any anticipated situations in any districts where a tower can be installed without <br />a conditional use permit. Mr. Brixius explained that in districts where towers are allowed <br />one can be installed by administrative use permit. Mr. Dunn requested the provisions <br />whereby an administrative use permit can be approved. Mr. Brixius indicated that this <br />information could be provided. He added that administrative use permits would be <br />limited to public /semi - public and industrial areas, as such antennas can only be attached <br />to existing structures. <br />Mr. Dunn then asked if the proposed ordinance is more restrictive with regard to personal <br />wireless service antennas than for commercial service. Mr. Brixius indicated that it is <br />only more restrictive with regard to location. He then pointed out that the ordinance <br />requires a conditional use permit for commercial service, which is more restrictive than <br />for personal wireless service. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if there is any ratio of area coverage to height of structure. Mr. Brixius <br />indicated that coverage depends upon a number of factors, such as topography and <br />population density. <br />Peter Beck of AT &T Wireless Service addressed the Board, explaining that he has <br />considerable experience with wireless service to the Twin Cities area. He explained that <br />with regard to cellular service each cell is assigned an area of coverage. Height of each <br />set of antennas is not necessarily determined solely on the size of each cell. With regard <br />to Mr. Dunn's question, Mr. Beck added that in fairly flat areas fewer towers may be <br />sufficient. However, he expressed concern about the proposed ordinance prohibiting <br />service to most of the Lino Lakes area, as it is a prime candidate for co- location but <br />without sufficient height service providers will not be able to co- locate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.