Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 8, 1998 <br />Page 16 <br />them at 500' for business purposes, but believed Lino Lakes had a good balance with the <br />sign ordinance as is. <br />Mr. Brixius suggested two changes to the recommendation which included the applicant <br />demonstrate and meet the 1,200' setback from adjoining GB and R districts and also a 60 <br />day removal after notice. He then asked if they saw any problem obtaining the MnDot <br />permit and Mr. Cronan explained that MnDot is reviewing the ordinance presently, and <br />they beleived it would be resolved. He noted that the interum use permit is a dual permit <br />that goes along with the MnDot permit, they can not use one without the other. <br />Chair Schaps asked about maintenance and the color of the pole and frame, stating the <br />often seen rust color. Mr. Cronan said that they use dark brown steel poles, which they <br />keep up with the maintenance, and the signs would be brand new. <br />Chair Schaps then asked if they had any guidelines in their interum use code that <br />regulates a maintenance schedule. Ms. Wyland noted there was a condition in the Sign <br />Ordinance that requires all signs to be maintained in good condition, resurfaced every two <br />years, if necessary as determined by the zoning official, and the surrounding area must be <br />cleaned after sign removal. <br />Mr. Corson again asked if their was any benefit to the City by allowing these signs. Mr. <br />Cronan stated that the relationship between the sign company and the City is basically a <br />business one. There is some benefit for the advertising of a new business in their area <br />and they will also do some public service advertising for the City. There are some <br />exceptions to this, such as a leasing situation, but that would not apply here. He also <br />mentioned the issue of defraying the cost of holding property until development reaches <br />it. <br />Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:40 p.m., and was <br />supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried, 7 -0. <br />Mr. Trehus asked who does the inspections of these signs and determines if they are <br />being propertly maintained. Ms. Wyland said that the Zoning Official is either the <br />building official or the planning coordinator depending on the issue. <br />Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve the nine interim use permits for advertising <br />signs along I -35E, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. <br />Motion carried 7 -0. <br />G. Site Plan Review, Rice Lake Covenant Church, 125 Ash Street <br />Ms. Wyland explained that Rice Creek Covenant Church is located at 125 Ash Street (C. <br />Rd. J) just west of Woodridge Drive. The Church has purchased a garage from the old <br />Arsenal Site in Arden Hills and would like to move it onto their property for storage <br />• <br />or <br />• <br />