Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 8, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br />creating two additional storm ponds. He stated that the requirements that Mr. Brixius <br />mentioned are acceptable, however, they would prefer the right -of -way be split 50/50. <br />Mr. Robinson asked for verification on proposed access over Ditch 10, if it turned to the <br />right and came back out by the Fina. Mr. Corson concurred with that and explained that <br />they wanted it to line up with the Village property. Mr. Robinson asked who owned <br />the property at the end of the cul -de -sac. Mr. Corson stated it was all separate property <br />owners. He explained how it lined up across the street showing the large parcel and <br />boundary which is zoned for multi - family. Mr. Robinson stated that it was the north <br />boundary of the church. Mr. Corson reviewed the map again showing the boundary <br />lines. Mr. Robinson expressed concern about the crossing over Ditch 10 and stated that it <br />will be quite a project as it is very deep. <br />Mr. Trehus asked for verification on the blue and green bordered wetland area. Mr. <br />Corson said that the green would become wetland and the blue was what they were <br />digging out to become storm water. <br />Mr. Dunn asked what the expected schedule was and Mr. Corson explained that they <br />would like to start this sometime this summer, noting that he had prepared the colored <br />map for them to get the idea of the concept and to show where the roads and buildings <br />would be. <br />Mr. Brixius asked if they had pursued a County Access Permit. Mr. Corson stated that <br />they had not yet received an official response from the County. Mr. Brixius suggested <br />that they make the permit a condition of plat approval. <br />Mr. Robinson asked if he thought the County would require a light there, noting that they <br />did require one at Elm Street. He explained that the City's Comprehensive Plan stated <br />that Elm Street and Village Drive would be two signaled areas, leaving the access in the <br />middle without a light. <br />Mr. Trehus asked if any of the current right -of -way for the temporary cul -de -sac would <br />be outside of Rehbein's property. Mr. Corson explained that they would not, as the cul- <br />de -sac comes up to the property and the proposed right -of -way dedication is entirely on <br />his property. <br />Mr. Ken Skogland, 4170 Lake Drive, came forward and stated he did like the plan, except <br />for the proposed road crossing the ditch. He explained that a road was also proposed in <br />1981 and it was turned down by the DNR, although he did not know why. He questioned <br />why the school would want a black topped area going to the Village Hall area, as they are <br />in two different school districts. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />