Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 8, 1998 <br />Page 7 <br />that the access would be about half way between Elm Street and Village Parkway. He <br />referred to a map and said that they wanted to be sure that any future acess in the large <br />undeveloped R2 area would provide a full intersection at Lake Drive, which they had <br />accomplished. Mr. Robinson then verified that the access would be north of the <br />Methodist Church and south of Palico. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if there were any plans in the Wetland Deliniation Plan to trade out <br />some land or if they are going to allow the wetlands to stay as is. Mr. Brixius stated that <br />there are big changes in the grading and wetland configuration to create buildable area on <br />Lot 4. They are trying to hold to the original configuration but also expand the building <br />pad to give it some additional depth.Additionally, as the wetland moves to the north side <br />of the street some mitigation will be required. Mr. Dunn asked if they were being <br />compliant with the traffic engineer's reccommendation in which Mr. Brixius verified that <br />they were. <br />Mr. Johnson asked what the zoning designation was for the area south of Lake Drive to <br />which Mr. Brixius answered it was Light- Industrial. Mr. Johnson wondered if this plat <br />could incorporate the excluded sites just to the south. Mr. Brixius stated that those would <br />have to be developed separatley. <br />Mr. Trehus mentioned that his copy of the map was very poor and wanted verification of <br />the two sites.Mr. Brixius then referred to a map and explained the exact location. He did <br />note there are two houses on that location. Mr. Trehus asked what the advantage of <br />shifting the right -of -way was. Mr. Brixius explained that the additional depth would <br />provide them with a larger building pad and better circulation. Additionally, if they shift <br />it over they take some of the burden off those lots which need the area for future use. <br />Mr. Trehus asked how far the proposed right -of -way extended onto the smaller lots <br />property. Mr. Brixius explained he was proposing a 60/40 arrangement, so the plat would <br />be dedicating an additional 20' of right -of -way. Mr. Trehus asked if there was currently a <br />right -of -way there and verified that the property owners would be losing another 20' of <br />their property when the road goes in at some point in the future, subject to another plat <br />and approval process. Mr. Brixius stated that there was no current right -of -way there and <br />concurred with his last statement. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if the Fire Department or Chief of Police had any comments regarding <br />the streets in regards to safety. Ms. Wyland stated that they had no concerns with the <br />plat. <br />Mr. Kirk Corson, representing Glen Rehbien Excavating, addressed the issue <br />regarding the wetlands on this site. He referred to a map detailing the current wetland <br />area and showed the area they are excavating to expand the wetland. He stated that they <br />are digging out more wetland than they are filling so they will be able to bank 3/10 of an <br />acre to use elsewhere. He continued saying that they are extending one pond but also <br />