Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 9, 1997 <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Johnson answered, 7+ acres. If it completely fills, it will be between 9.5 and <br />10 acres. Two smaller ponds will also be built. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if there is any danger that the runoff will move in an easterly <br />direction that would impact the row of homes in the Second Addition. <br />Mr. Johnson explained that there is a culvert between Lot Nos. 20 and 21 and in <br />the middle of the block between Palomino and Appaloosa. The culverts are 36 <br />inches to 42 inches in height and flow from west to east. All of the runoff from <br />250 acres upstream of the ditch can be stored with the outlet discharge rate of <br />less than 1 CMS. Increased capacity is provided to preserve wildlife habitats <br />from the rapid rise and drop in elevation. The level of the pond will vary a foot or <br />two unless there are downstream conditions to affect it. The lowest floor <br />elevation of the pond is 2 feet above 898. <br />Mr. Robinson questioned the feasibility of adequate drainage of the property to <br />the north. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that the wetland would need to be drained and the water <br />table lowered. Even though there is dry wetland, the soil meets wetland criteria. <br />To improve drainage, the developer proposes to improve drainage maintenance <br />and make sure properties are not exposed to flood risk. He believes the plan <br />meets or exceeds that objective. He added that the developer is working closely <br />with the watershed district and does not anticipate any problems with approval. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if the developer has a tree preservation policy. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that the lots with trees will be treated selectively, so that only <br />trees necessary to build a street will be removed. Home buyers will be able to <br />select how a house is set on a lot with respect to the trees on that lot. <br />Mr. Uhde, Developer, stated that the Second and Third Additions were approved <br />by the Board without formal approval from the Metropolitan Council on the MUSA <br />expansion. The approval from the Board was contingent upon the MUSA <br />expansion. Therefore, he is not certain what concern there is for precedent. <br />Grading is an issue for this construction season, and a grading permit has been <br />available before preliminary plat approval in the past. He requested the Board to <br />reconsider its position and consider approval of the application at this meeting. <br />The longer the project is delayed, the higher the cost and he would like to keep <br />the lots affordable. <br />Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Uhde met with the neighbor who expressed concern about <br />privacy. <br />