Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 8, 1997 <br />Page 4 <br />Air Safety Zone. In response to concerns over the air safety zone of the nearby Lino <br />Airpark, the applicant has submitted a plan which superimposes the Airpark's approach <br />zone upon the subject site. Based on this plan, it is concluded that the proposed batch <br />plant height (80 feet) will not encroach into the required Airpark approach zone. <br />Darin Burckhard, Structural Engineer for this project, stated that additional information <br />not included in the packets before the Board, had been provided immediately prior to this <br />evening's meeting. This additional information addressed issues discussed at the most <br />recent neighborhood meeting held on Thursday, October 2, 1997. <br />Chair Schaps indicated that the Board did not have that information before them. <br />Mr. Burckhard proceeded to review this information verbally, stating that agreement had <br />been reached to place the planting buffer at the 150 -foot setback line. <br />Chair Schaps requested clarification that this placement would result in 110 feet of <br />undisturbed area. Mr. Burckhard responded in the affirmative, adding that the proposed <br />placement had been marked with yellow stringline, and that the berm would curve around <br />the existing planting at the 150 -foot line. <br />Mr. Brixius asked about change to the existing landscape plan. <br />Chair Schaps asked about attendance at the most recent neighborhood meeting. Mr. <br />Burckhard responded 13 individuals had signed the attendance register. <br />Mr. Burckhard indicated that a resident had requested that a row of evergreens be planted <br />along with deciduous trees to ensure year -round visual appeal. In response to Mr. <br />Brixius's question regarding the landscape plan, Mr. Burckhard indicated that there should <br />be ample time to make the recommended adjustments to the proposed schedule. <br />Mr. Gelbmann asked if an irrigation system is proposed for the berm. Mr. Burckhard <br />responded yes, and that a maintenance program is also proposed. <br />Mr. Herr asked Mr. Ahrens about the suitability of 4th Avenue to handle the additional <br />truck traffic. Mr. Ahrens explained that 4th Avenue is a collector route, constructed to 9- <br />ton design strength (although it is posted as having a 7 -ton limit). <br />Mr. Johnson suggested that approval recommendation Condition 5 might contain a <br />contradiction in terms as worded. Mr. Brixius explained that reference to "permissible <br />exterior lighting" is intended for any lighting that might be determined to be necessary on <br />the remainder of the site beyond the outdoor storage area (north of 77th Street). <br />Mr. Johnson also asked about the intended hours of operation. Randy Molin, facility <br />manager, responded that current operation activity begins at 4:00 a.m. With specific <br />reference to Condition 12.c., Mr. Molin indicated that strobe lights would replace backup <br />