My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
12/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:47:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2014 10:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 11, 1996 <br />Page 12 <br />Mr. Gelbmann asked the total amount of acreage that the developer, Mr. Uhde, <br />• is purchasing for development. <br />• <br />Mr. Brixius answered that the largest lot is 2.5 acres. <br />City Engineer Ahrens stated that the total acreage of the lots being considered is <br />6.7 acres. <br />Mr. Gelbmann noted recent septic failure systems in other parts of the City and <br />asked if these properties are likely to experience the same circumstance. <br />Considering the Metropolitan Council's position to restrict MUSA boundaries, this <br />would be a difficult set of circumstances should there be a septic system failure. <br />Mr. Wessel stated that the Metropolitan Council is on record as being supportive <br />to extension of utility systems in emergency situations. <br />Mr. Johnson noted that a Comprehensive Plan decision would need to be made <br />to shift this property from Rural Low Density to R -1 Low Density, which would be <br />consistent with the 1994 decision that changed the zoning of the Behm Century <br />Farm from Rural to R -1. He further noted that a subdivision in the southern part <br />of the City was rejected because of inadequate roads and access. He asked if <br />that is an issue with this expansion. <br />Mr. Ahrens stated that the access road is County Road 153, which is a two -lane, <br />rural roadway with 12 -foot lanes. It is a standard design width, and he does not <br />believe the road presents a problem. <br />Ms. Dahl asked the time frame for extending utilities to these properties and <br />further why this application is being submitted at this time, if there is no definite <br />time frame for utility service. <br />Mr. Brixius stated that the most certain date for MUSA boundaries to include this <br />property would be the completion of the Comprehensive Plan. It will be 18 <br />months to two years for everything to be completed and approved by the <br />Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has also indicated that they do <br />not want to see expanded MUSA boundaries north of I -35W until the City has a <br />plan in place to address traffic concerns. The reason the application has come <br />forward is because the five property owners have agreed to sell their land to the <br />developer. <br />Mr. Herr asked if the potential sewer line location would be affected by this <br />proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.