My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
12/11/1996 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:47:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2014 10:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 11, 1996 <br />Page 7 <br />2. The City approve a variance to allow guest parking within five feet <br />of the project's internal streets. <br />3. The previously approved landscape plan is revised to address <br />landscaping treatments to be applied to the area of the site where <br />the five -unit structure was previously proposed. <br />4. Parallel parking is prohibited along the proposed 28 -foot wide <br />driveways. <br />5. A determination is made that applicable handicap parking <br />requirements have been satisfied over the entire site. <br />6. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard <br />to snow storage. <br />7 The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard <br />to grading, drainage and utility issues. Such comments should <br />address grading, drainage issues associated with the western area <br />of the site where the five -unit structure had previously been <br />proposed. <br />8. Any restrictive covenants which vary from those applied to Phase I <br />of the project are subject to City review and approval. <br />9. Comments of other City staff. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there are plans for the western portion of the site <br />Mr. Brixius responded that unless additional land is added to the parcel, two <br />more units could be developed and still meet maximum density requirements. It <br />is not likely that there will be commercial development north of Aqua Lane which <br />will probably remain zoned R -4. In that case, he could envision a continuation of <br />the existing development. <br />Mr. Wessel stated that it is important to stress that the City has made no <br />commitments for a future commercial site. At the present time it is zoned R -4 <br />and will remain so. <br />Mr. Dunn asked why the two buildings now being proposed were not included <br />with the first phase. <br />• Mr. Brixius stated that the shoreland regulations adopted by the City in 1980 did <br />not make provisions for impervious surface or storm water management. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.