Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 13, 1996 <br />Mr. Brixius stated that a review of the City Zoning Ordinance was initiated in July <br />1995. The major focus of the draft ordinance being presented is that it has been <br />reformatted in a manner that is more user friendly. Single topics were <br />referenced in several places in the old ordinance, some with conflicting <br />provisions. The new draft maintains the original content as much as possible to <br />avoid conflicts with past City decisions, but it has been rearranged so that <br />information on one topic is all in one place. The new format also has a new <br />page numbering system to facilitate future amendments. Although there are <br />some redundancies from one zoning district to another with different types of <br />uses, the new ordinance attempts to establish each zoning district as a single <br />entity. The draft ordinance contains nine sections, and Mr. Brixius summarized <br />the following changes: <br />Section 1. Title /Application /Rules: This section contains new language that <br />relates to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. New uses not provided for in the <br />current zoning districts are prohibited until the City has time to respond with <br />proper public hearings. The relationship of zoning to planning is a vital element. <br />Definitions and additional rules are included in Section 1. One significant <br />change is the definition of "Agricultural Farm Building," which is defined as, "An <br />accessory building designed, constructed, used or intended to house farm <br />implements or agriculture areas, as defined by this Ordinance, on an active farm <br />operation of more than twenty (20) acres." The old zoning ordinance stipulated <br />10 acres. This was a suggestion by the Building Inspector. Agriculture farms do <br />not require a building permit, and it was felt that 20 acres is more appropriate <br />than 10 acres. Section 1 also includes flood plain rules. <br />Mr. Brixius noted the additions of paragraphs G. Authority and H. <br />Comprehensive Revision on page 1 -3. The Municipal Planning Act requires that <br />zoning ordinances and comprehensive plans be consistent. Should there be any <br />inconsistencies between them, the Comprehensive Plan will supersede the <br />zoning ordinance. How the Comprehensive Plan relates to City policy will be the <br />criteria by which zoning changes and conditional use permits are approved or <br />denied. Specific findings will be established for approval and denial. <br />Section 2. Administration: One significant change in this section is the state <br />requirement that all development applications be acted on within 60 days of <br />receipt. Within the first 10 days, the City must determine whether or not the <br />application is complete. The City can extend the 60 -day period but cannot go <br />beyond 120 days without the permission of the applicant. <br />Page 2 -1, under Administration: Amendments and Rezonings, Mr. Brixius noted <br />that within the past year the City approved a text amendment that expanded <br />notification for any zoning change or Municipal Utility Service Area (MUSA) <br />change from 350 feet to 600 feet. Language for that change has been <br />incorporated into this section. <br />