Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 13, 1996 <br />On page 2 -2, an attempt has been made to identify criteria for any zoning <br />change that are: 1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 2) compatible with <br />the intent for future land uses of the area; 3) conform to all performance <br />standards in the zoning ordinance; 4) accommodation of existing public services <br />for the proposed use; and 5) traffic generation from the proposed use is within <br />the capability limits of the streets serving the area. These criteria will provide the <br />Board and the Council the opportunity to make specific findings in favor or denial <br />of a zoning change application. <br />Section 3. General Provisions: Under the nonconforming rules most of the <br />existing language was retained with one exception. Previously, the City allowed <br />a nonconforming use to be re- established unless the cost of repair was 75 <br />percent or more of its current fair market value. This provision has been <br />changed to 50 percent with an option for appeal. This change will make it easier <br />for the City to ultimately implement the Comprehensive Plan and bring <br />nonconforming uses into compliance with the zoning ordinance. <br />On page 3 -5, there is a definition of buildable area for minimum lot sizes of less <br />than 10 acres and lots that are 10 acres or more that addresses a previous <br />conflict between the zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinances. In zoning <br />districts where minimum lot size requirements are under 10 acres, the buildable <br />area "...shall be exclusive of floodplains, watercourses, wetlands, water bodies, <br />and street rights -of- way." The buildable area in "...zoning districts with minimum <br />lot sizes of 10 acres or more, up to 80 percent of the minimum lot area may be <br />comprised of areas which are platted as street rights -of -way, below the 100 -year <br />flood elevation, or lie within City watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies as <br />defined by this ordinance." <br />Page 3 -5, paragraphs C.2. and C.3. address the problem of the previous <br />ordinance that allowed multiple principal structures on a single lot. Unless <br />allowed through a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) in a Residential District, <br />only one principal use shall be allowed per lot. Allowing multiple structures <br />through the PDO process would require a public hearing which was not <br />previously required. This change does not apply to commercial and industrial <br />uses. <br />Page 3 -10 incorporates new language for building and pole barn construction. A <br />percentage of the building that can be finished with metal panels is established, <br />and the remainder is to be finished with a masonry facade. This allows flexibility <br />in architectural design and still promotes a high quality development. <br />Page 3 -18 addresses accessory buildings, and new language attempts to <br />simplify the code and give property owners more flexibility in how accessory <br />buildings can be used. Property owners can choose to have one larger or two <br />smaller accessory buildings, as stipulated. <br />