My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/14/1996 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
02/14/1996 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 10:56:26 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 10:29:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
02/14/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />FEBRUARY 14, 1996 <br />Planning Coordinator Wyland explained City staff has made <br />this request because changes may be made by the <br />Metropolitan Council in the near future which would make <br />this request unnecessary. Mr. Vaughn has been contacted <br />and is agreeable to the delay. <br />Bill Johnson made a MOTION to continue the Public hearing <br />for Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Land <br />Exchange within Pheasant Hills Preserve, Ed Vaughn, <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve Phase 7 to the March 13, 1996 <br />Planning and Zoning Board meeting and was supported by <br />Thomas Mesich. All voted in favor. Motion carried. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS: <br />A. Rick Carlson - Development South of Pineridge II and <br />III and North of 62nd Street <br />Mr. Ted Matke stated Mr. Carlson had purchased the <br />property and would like to develop it into single family <br />homes. He provided a sketch plan which illustrated the <br />basic layout of the proposed development. <br />• Mr. Herr asked what was proposed for the strip of land on <br />the west side of the pond. <br />• <br />Mr. Matke stated Mr. Carlson finds it best to plat <br />through the ponds. <br />Planning Consultant Brixius noted this was only a concept <br />plan. He stated he agreed with Mr. Matke that this was <br />a logical extension of the MUSA. <br />Chair Schaps asked the reasoning for the outlot. <br />Mr. Matke explained the property owner wanted to maintain <br />enough land to split off another parcel of land to be <br />developed into four lots and sold at a later date. <br />Mr. Johnson noted the connection to the trail corridor <br />would have to be though an existing _lot. He noted Ware <br />Road was in need of repair and this proposal would add <br />more traffic. <br />Mr. Mesich stated he had no problem with the concept plan <br />but was concerned with the limited access. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.