Laserfiche WebLink
P & Z Work Session <br />10/27/93 <br />indicated development in the area was inevitable, she asked the <br />City to adopt a policy of quality, not quantity. <br />Tom Mesich asked why she felt development was inevitable - Ms. Hunt <br />stated that she is aware the northern suburbs are expanding. In <br />response to another question by Mr. Mesich she indicated that they <br />have not had any problems with their septic system. <br />A resident asked if Options B and C would bring sewer to the larger <br />lots and Mr. Uhde replied - no it would not - those lots would most <br />likely have mound type septic system. Mr. Uhde added that he did <br />not feel on -site systems were the best alternative and added that <br />in the long run probably not the most cost effective option either. <br />Mr. Jim Balboa of 4th Avenue and Thomas indicated that the original <br />concerns expressed when the proposal was first reviewed still <br />stand. The proposed development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding area. We live out here for the openness. <br />Another resident asked if there was a formula to determine the cost <br />to connect to sewer and water for the larger lots. Darrell <br />Schneider explained that there was a formula based on the area and <br />footage. However, he further explained that if a property owner <br />was only connecting his existing house and not planning to <br />subdivide that the cost would be between $11,000- $12,000 depending <br />on the average sized lot in the proposed development (this would <br />apply even if the property were a larger piece, at least until such <br />time as they would wish to subdivide further). <br />A resident asked if Carl Street would be part of this plan and <br />expressed concern about development continuing to the north. Mr. <br />Johnson explained that Carl Street was not a part of this proposal. <br />Chairman Schaps further explained that no one could answer at this <br />time whether development would continue to the north. It remains <br />to be seen! <br />Mr. Uhde advised the audience that the approximate cost of a mound <br />septic system is between $7- 8,000, a well between $2- 3,000. On- <br />site systems are not fool proof - they do fail. The cost is about <br />the same for City sewer and water and it will last forever. <br />Therefore, there is a positive side to City utilities. Mr. Mesich <br />pointed out that there is a monthly bill of approximately $30 for <br />City sewer and water. Mr. Landers asked how many people in the <br />audience had failing septic systems. No one responded. However, <br />the comment was made that "who would want to say yes and then have <br />the City force some correction! ?" <br />A resident at 7744 Sunset stated that he had been told the soils in <br />the area were not good for septic systems. Mr. Uhde added that if <br />Options B or C are approved they would be proposing mound systems <br />for that very reason. <br />Tom Mesich asked about the commercial development along Fourth <br />Avenue. Darrell Schneider replied that Accu -Tool, Kosner- Gertz, <br />and the Correctional Facility are all interested in having public <br />3 <br />