02/14/1990 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD February 14, 1990 divided into four R -1 lots. Each of the lots meets the "rule of two -of- three" as each as area and depth required in the city's zoning ordinance. Mr. Chase did not feel comfortable with the board going by the "rule of two -of- three" because it has not been formally passed as of yet. Mr. Chase recommend a variance be required. The application number given was #90 -10. MOTION: Mr. King moved to recommend to city council approval of a minor subdivision for Stephen and Laurie Schwartzbauer for property located at 7048 Sunrise Drive as shown in Application #90 -08. Al Robinson seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. MOTION: Al Robinson moved to recommend to city council approval of a variance for Stephen and Laurie Schwartzbauer for property located at 7048 Sunrise Drive allowing frontage to be 76 feet instead of 80 feet on Lot C. Mr. King seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously. Harold Bisel asked if a variance is required because originally the required front footage was 75 five feet when these parcels were created and these lots would be grandfathered in. Pete Kluegel said that in 1988 the city council increased the lot width from 75 to 80 feet. John Miller explained that when sewer became available it gave the residents the option to subdivide their one - -acre parcels into sewer size lots. The P &Z board knew that if they wished to subdivide, they would not meet the 80 foot width in at least one of the lots. This is why the board created the two -of -three rule. This rule means that the applicant has to meet two -of -three requirements in width, depth or area in order to have it approved without requiring a variance. REVIEW OF THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. By State Law it is required that the Capital Improvement Plan be reviewed by the board's for its compliance with the comprehensive plan. Copies of the comprehensive plan were distributed to the board members. The City Engineer is working with the Metropolitan Council and they asked that the city complete a Capital Improvement Plan. The City of Lino Lakes has not had a CIP in the past. This is not in a complete form, and the board is asked to give their comments. Mr. Miller would like to be notified if any board members feel that something has been left out. John Miller asked the board members to think about how they would like to see their community grow, and how is that reflected in this CIP. Page 5